SCDS vs SEIS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF vs SEI Select Small Cap ETF
Which is better, SCDS or SEIS?
Nearly the same fund. SCDS costs less.
SCDS has a lower expense ratio. SCDS led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. SEIS is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 12.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCDS | SEIS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40%Best | 0.55% |
| AUM | $9M | $607M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 0.35% |
| Holdings | 279 | 767 |
| YTD Return | +17.38%Best | +10.36% |
| 1Y Return | +21.08%Best | +11.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4%Tie | 18.4%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -26.7% | -25.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $13,340Best | $12,417 |
| Top 10 Weight | 12.9% | 10.5%Best |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 7, 2024 | Oct 8, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 10, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
SCDS vs SEIS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
SCDS vs SEIS Performance
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS) is an ETF from SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS. Over the past year SCDS returned +21.08% while SEIS returned +11.88%. Year to date, SCDS is up 17.38% versus a gain of 10.36% for SEIS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCDS and SEIS have been equally volatile, both at 18.4% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.7% for SCDS and -25.7% for SEIS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCDS charges 0.40% per year while SEIS charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $55 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCDS currently yields 1.12% against 0.35% for SEIS.
Holdings Overlap
31.0% of SCDS's money is in holdings SEIS also owns. 23.8% of SEIS's money is in holdings SCDS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
73 positions in common, counted across the 274 positions we hold weights for in SCDS and 369 in SEIS, against full books of 279 and 767.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 278 positions for SEIS that do not appear in our book for SCDS (71.2% of the fund), and 189 for SCDS that do not appear in SEIS (65.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCDS | Weight in SEIS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTSWatts Water Technologies Inc | 0.71% | 1.07% | 0.36% |
| TWSTTwist Bioscience Corp. | 1.36% | 0.27% | 1.09% |
| ENVAEnova International Inc | 0.57% | 1.00% | 0.43% |
| ANFAbercrombie & Fitch Co. Class A | 0.31% | 1.24% | 0.93% |
| CHEFChef Holdings, Inc. | 1.16% | 0.31% | 0.85% |
| URBNUrban Outfitters Inc | 0.31% | 1.09% | 0.78% |
| JXNJackson Financial Inc USD | 0.37% | 1.01% | 0.64% |
| CMCCommercial Metals Co | 0.46% | 0.88% | 0.42% |
| EXLSExlservice Holdings, Inc. (A) | 0.36% | 0.94% | 0.58% |
| YOUClear Secure Inc -Class A | 0.45% | 0.71% | 0.26% |
31.0% of SCDS is already inside SEIS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCDS or SEIS?
SCDS has an expense ratio of 0.40% while SEIS charges 0.55%. SCDS is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCDS or SEIS?
Over the past year SCDS returned +21.08% vs +11.88% for SEIS, so SCDS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SCDS annualized +15.50% vs +11.43% for SEIS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCDS or SEIS?
SCDS and SEIS have been equally volatile, both at 18.4% annualized. Worst drawdown: SCDS -26.7% vs SEIS -25.7%.
Should I hold both SCDS and SEIS?
SCDS and SEIS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SCDS and SEIS?
31.0% of SCDS's money is in holdings SEIS also owns. 23.8% of SEIS's is in holdings SCDS also owns. They hold 73 positions in common, counted across the 274 positions we hold weights for in SCDS and 369 in SEIS.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCDS or SEIS?
SCDS yields 1.12% while SEIS yields 0.35%, so SCDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SEIS better than SCDS?
SCDS has a lower expense ratio. SCDS led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. SEIS is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 12.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.