SCHD vs SPHQ
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Which is better, SCHD or SPHQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, SPHQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | SPHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.15% |
| AUM | $111.6B | $19.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.24% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 206 | 206 |
| YTD Return | +24.55%Best | +12.89% |
| 1Y Return | +29.85%Best | +16.16% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.64% | +19.56%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.54% | +12.58%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -32.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,771 | $18,084Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.6%Best | 43.5% |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Dec 6, 2005 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Oct 14, 2026 (15 years).
SCHD vs SPHQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15 years both funds cover.
SCHD vs SPHQ Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year SCHD returned +29.85% while SPHQ returned +16.16%. Year to date, SCHD is up 24.55% versus a gain of 12.89% for SPHQ.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +16.64% per year against +19.56% for SPHQ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.54% and +12.58% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SPHQ has the edge at +13.62% annualized vs +11.26%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.7% compared with 13.3% for SPHQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -32.0% for SPHQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while SPHQ charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $15 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.24% against 1.03% for SPHQ.
Holdings Overlap
27.0% of SCHD's money is in holdings SPHQ also owns. 12.7% of SPHQ's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.
SCHD and SPHQ share little of their money.
14 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 100 in SPHQ, against full books of 206 and 206.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 86 positions for SPHQ that do not appear in our book for SCHD (87.4% of the fund), and 83 for SCHD that do not appear in SPHQ (72.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCHD | Weight in SPHQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 4.89% | 2.37% | 2.52% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 4.61% | 2.58% | 2.03% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 4.16% | 2.87% | 1.29% |
| ACNAccenture Plc | 3.13% | 1.06% | 2.07% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 2.63% | 1.01% | 1.62% |
| LMTLockheed Martin | 2.64% | 0.96% | 1.68% |
| FASTFastenal Co. | 1.50% | 0.53% | 0.97% |
| KMBKimberly-Clark Corp. | 0.81% | 0.30% | 0.51% |
| CINFCincinnati Financial Corp. | 0.64% | 0.22% | 0.42% |
| TROWT Rowe Price Grp | 0.57% | 0.21% | 0.36% |
27.0% of SCHD is already inside SPHQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or SPHQ?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while SPHQ charges 0.15%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHD or SPHQ?
Over the past year SCHD returned +29.85% vs +16.16% for SPHQ, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SCHD annualized +11.26% vs +13.62% for SPHQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCHD or SPHQ?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.7% annualized versus 13.3% for SPHQ. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs SPHQ -32.0%.
Should I hold both SCHD and SPHQ?
SCHD and SPHQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and SPHQ?
27.0% of SCHD's money is in holdings SPHQ also owns. 12.7% of SPHQ's is in holdings SCHD also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 100 in SPHQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or SPHQ?
SCHD yields 3.24% while SPHQ yields 1.03%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPHQ better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, SPHQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.