SCHD vs XYZG
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF
Which is better, SCHD or XYZG?
Large Cap Value against Trading-Leveraged Equity.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | XYZG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.78% |
| AUM | $111.6B | $1M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.24% | 5.42% |
| Holdings | 206 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +24.55%Best | +2.48% |
| 1Y Return | +29.85%Best | -30.25% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.64% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.54% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0%Best | 56.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -6.9%Best | -69.4% |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $13,984Best | $12,424 |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Leverage Shares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Apr 4, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 4, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.5 years).
SCHD vs XYZG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
SCHD vs XYZG Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares. Over the past year SCHD returned +29.85% while XYZG returned -30.25%. Year to date, SCHD is up 24.55% versus a gain of 2.48% for XYZG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XYZG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 56.6% compared with 13.0% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.9% for SCHD and -69.4% for XYZG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while XYZG charges 0.78%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $78 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.24% against 5.42% for XYZG.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and XYZG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or XYZG?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while XYZG charges 0.78%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHD or XYZG?
Over the past year SCHD returned +29.85% vs -30.25% for XYZG, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SCHD annualized +25.05% vs +15.57% for XYZG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCHD or XYZG?
XYZG has been the more volatile fund at 56.6% annualized versus 13.0% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -6.9% vs XYZG -69.4%.
Should I hold both SCHD and XYZG?
SCHD and XYZG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or XYZG?
SCHD yields 3.24% while XYZG yields 5.42%, so XYZG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XYZG better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.