SCHX vs XLSR
Schwab US Large-Cap ETF vs State Street US Sector Rotation ETF
Which is better, SCHX or XLSR?
Nearly the same fund. SCHX costs less.
SCHX has a lower expense ratio. SCHX led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. SCHX is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 85.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHX | XLSR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.70% |
| AUM | $75.3B | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.04% | 0.40% |
| Holdings | 752 | 26 |
| YTD Return | +13.46%Best | +8.22% |
| 1Y Return | +16.47%Best | +12.87% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.38%Best | +17.59% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.48%Best | +9.72% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 16.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -32.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,004Best | $15,901 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.9%Best | 85.3% |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 3, 2009 | Apr 2, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 3, 2019 to Oct 15, 2026 (7.5 years).
SCHX vs XLSR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.5 years both funds cover.
SCHX vs XLSR Performance
Schwab US Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and State Street US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year SCHX returned +16.47% while XLSR returned +12.87%. Year to date, SCHX is up 13.46% versus a gain of 8.22% for XLSR.
Over three years, SCHX compounded at +22.38% per year against +17.59% for XLSR; over five years the annualized figures are +12.48% and +9.72% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, SCHX has the edge at +15.01% annualized vs +12.38%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 16.1% for XLSR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for SCHX and -32.9% for XLSR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHX charges 0.03% per year while XLSR charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $70 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHX currently yields 1.04% against 0.40% for XLSR.
Holdings Overlap
40.6% of SCHX's money is in holdings XLSR also owns. 28.3% of XLSR's money is in holdings SCHX also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 752 positions we hold weights for in SCHX and 25 in XLSR, against full books of 752 and 26.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 752 and 25 positions we hold weights for.
SCHX holds 712 positions XLSR does not, 58.6% of the fund.
Largest: BRK.B 1.33%, LLY 1.30%, JPM 1.25%, V 0.87%, JNJ 0.87%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCHX | Weight in XLSR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.02% | 4.47% | 3.55% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.90% | 4.12% | 2.78% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.44% | 2.98% | 2.46% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 2.86% | 5.17% | 2.31% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.29% | 4.02% | 1.73% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.28% | 3.03% | 0.75% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.50% | 0.95% | 2.55% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.40% | 1.41% | 0.99% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.72% | 0.62% | 1.10% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.47% | 0.15% | 1.32% |
40.6% of SCHX is already inside XLSR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHX or XLSR?
SCHX has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XLSR charges 0.70%. SCHX is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHX or XLSR?
Over the past year SCHX returned +16.47% vs +12.87% for XLSR, so SCHX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), SCHX annualized +15.01% vs +12.38% for XLSR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCHX or XLSR?
SCHX has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 16.1% for XLSR. Worst drawdown: SCHX -34.3% vs XLSR -32.9%.
Should I hold both SCHX and XLSR?
SCHX and XLSR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHX and XLSR?
40.6% of SCHX's money is in holdings XLSR also owns. 28.3% of XLSR's is in holdings SCHX also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 752 positions we hold weights for in SCHX and 25 in XLSR.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHX or XLSR?
SCHX yields 1.04% while XLSR yields 0.40%, so SCHX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XLSR better than SCHX?
SCHX has a lower expense ratio. SCHX led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. SCHX is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 85.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.