SDS vs SH

SDS vs SH

Which is better, SDS or SH?

Nearly the same fund. SH costs less.

SH has a lower expense ratio. SH led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99.

Lower Fees: SHHigher Returns: SH

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSDSSH
Expense Ratio0.91%0.88%Best
AUM$348M$964M
Dividend Yield5.19%3.92%
Holdings2016
YTD Return-19.15%-8.49%Best
1Y Return-23.19%-10.36%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-29.75%-13.82%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-20.88%-8.55%Best
Volatility (annualized)28.1%14.9%Best
Max Drawdown--95.5%
$10,000 over 5 years$3,100$6,396Best
Fund FamilyProSharesProShares
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleTrading-Inverse EquityTrading-Inverse Equity
InceptionJul 11, 2006Jun 19, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 13, 2006 to Oct 14, 2026 (20.3 years).

SDS vs SH growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20.3 years both funds cover.

Compare SDS against instead:SDS vs SPYSDS vs QQQSDS vs VOOSDS vs VTISH against:SH vs VXUS

SDS vs SH Performance

ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) is an ETF from ProShares and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year SDS returned -23.19% while SH returned -10.36%. Year to date, SDS is down 19.15% versus a loss of 8.49% for SH.

Over three years, SDS compounded at -29.75% per year against -13.82% for SH; over five years the annualized figures are -20.88% and -8.55% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, SH has the edge at -12.48% annualized vs -26.09%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.1% compared with 14.9% for SH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SDS charges 0.91% per year while SH charges 0.88%. On a $10,000 position that is $91 vs $88 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SDS currently yields 5.19% against 3.92% for SH.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1 holding in SDS and 1 in SH, totalling 93.5% and 87.7% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.

1 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in SDS and 1 in SH, against full books of 20 and 16.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SDSWeight in SHDifference
IQMMProshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf93.48%87.68%5.80%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of SDS and SH you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

SDSSH

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SDS or SH?

SDS has an expense ratio of 0.91% while SH charges 0.88%. SH is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, SDS or SH?

Over the past year SDS returned -23.19% vs -10.36% for SH, so SH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), SDS annualized -26.09% vs -12.48% for SH. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SDS or SH?

SDS has been the more volatile fund at 28.1% annualized versus 14.9% for SH.

Should I hold both SDS and SH?

SDS and SH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, SDS or SH?

SDS yields 5.19% while SH yields 3.92%, so SDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SH better than SDS?

SH has a lower expense ratio. SH led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.