SECT vs XVOL
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs Acruence Active Hedge US Equity ETF
Which is better, SECT or XVOL?
SECT has been ahead.
SECT has a lower expense ratio. SECT led over 1Y and the full window. XVOL is less concentrated, with 17.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SECT | XVOL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69%Best | 0.83% |
| AUM | $2.9B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 2.00% |
| Holdings | 19 | 83 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3%Best | 16.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.7%Best | -25.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,156Best | $12,636 |
| Top 10 Weight | 100.0% | 17.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC | Acruence Capital, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 5, 2017 | Apr 21, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 181 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. SECT has data through Oct 14, 2026 and XVOL through Apr 16, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 22, 2021 to Apr 16, 2026 (5 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XVOL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.3% for SECT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.7% for SECT and -25.8% for XVOL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SECT charges 0.69% per year while XVOL charges 0.83%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $83 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SECT currently yields 0.69% against 2.00% for XVOL.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 10 holdings in SECT and 81 in XVOL, totalling 100.0% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 274 days apart, SECT as of Oct 1, 2026 and XVOL as of Dec 31, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in SECT and 81 in XVOL, against full books of 19 and 83.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 79 positions for XVOL that do not appear in our book for SECT (97.5% of the fund), and 10 for SECT that do not appear in XVOL (100.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SECT and XVOL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SECT or XVOL?
SECT has an expense ratio of 0.69% while XVOL charges 0.83%. SECT is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, SECT or XVOL?
XVOL has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.3% for SECT. Worst drawdown: SECT -21.7% vs XVOL -25.8%.
Should I hold both SECT and XVOL?
SECT and XVOL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SECT or XVOL?
SECT yields 0.69% while XVOL yields 2.00%, so XVOL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XVOL better than SECT?
SECT has a lower expense ratio. SECT led over 1Y and the full window. XVOL is less concentrated, with 17.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.