SEIM vs VTI
SEI QiM US Large Cap Momentum Active ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SEIM or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SEIM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SEIM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.6B | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.54% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 77 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +14.55%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +19.40%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.94%Best | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.8% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.2% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.4 years | $21,923Best | $20,431 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.0% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 18, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 18, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.4 years).
SEIM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.
SEIM vs VTI Performance
SEI QiM US Large Cap Momentum Active ETF (SEIM) is an ETF from SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SEIM returned +19.40% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, SEIM is up 14.55% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, SEIM compounded at +27.94% per year against +21.97% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, SEIM has the edge at +19.53% annualized vs +17.63%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SEIM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.8% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.2% for SEIM and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SEIM charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SEIM currently yields 0.54% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
95.9% of SEIM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 37.8% of VTI's money is in holdings SEIM also owns.
Most of SEIM is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
74 positions in common, counted across the 78 positions we hold weights for in SEIM and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 77 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,083 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SEIM (59.8% of the fund), and 2 for SEIM that do not appear in VTI (3.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SEIM | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.55% | 6.88% | 0.33% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.43% | 6.30% | 2.87% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 5.88% | 2.70% | 3.18% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.85% | 5.11% | 2.26% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.14% | 3.41% | 2.27% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.93% | 1.46% | 1.47% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 3.08% | 0.85% | 2.23% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 3.14% | 0.51% | 2.63% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.61% | 0.87% | 1.74% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 2.96% | 0.18% | 2.78% |
95.9% of SEIM is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SEIM or VTI?
SEIM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SEIM or VTI?
Over the past year SEIM returned +19.40% vs +16.63% for VTI, so SEIM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SEIM annualized +19.53% vs +17.63% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SEIM or VTI?
SEIM has been the more volatile fund at 17.8% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SEIM -22.2% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both SEIM and VTI?
SEIM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SEIM and VTI?
95.9% of SEIM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 37.8% of VTI's is in holdings SEIM also owns. They hold 74 positions in common, counted across the 78 positions we hold weights for in SEIM and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SEIM or VTI?
SEIM yields 0.54% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SEIM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SEIM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.