SFTY vs VTI

SFTY vs VTI

Which is better, SFTY or VTI?

Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. SFTY led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.9%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSFTYVTI
Expense Ratio0.77%0.03%Best
AUM$818M$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.17%1.06%
Holdings3363,524
YTD Return+13.47%Best+13.02%
1Y Return+16.90%Best+16.63%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.97%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.99%
Volatility (annualized)10.5%Best11.4%
Max Drawdown-8.6%Best-8.9%
$10,000 over 1.3 years$12,688$12,697Best
Top 10 Weight41.9%33.5%Best
Fund FamilyHorizon FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 25, 2025May 24, 2001

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).

SFTY vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.

SFTY vs VTI Performance

Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) is an ETF from Horizon Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SFTY returned +16.90% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, SFTY is up 13.47% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.4% compared with 10.5% for SFTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.6% for SFTY and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SFTY charges 0.77% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $77 vs $3 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SFTY currently yields 0.17% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

SFTY already in VTI91.8%
VTI already in SFTY69.3%

91.8% of SFTY's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 69.3% of VTI's money is in holdings SFTY also owns.

Most of SFTY is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

162 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in SFTY and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 336 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 994 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SFTY (28.3% of the fund), and 5 for SFTY that do not appear in VTI (8.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SFTYWeight in VTIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp6.70%6.88%0.18%
AAPLApple, Inc6.65%6.30%0.35%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.22%5.11%0.11%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc5.21%2.70%2.51%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.87%3.41%1.54%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.75%2.38%0.37%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.43%1.46%0.97%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity2.59%1.23%1.36%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.84%1.70%0.14%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.94%1.33%0.61%

91.8% of SFTY is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SFTYVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SFTY or VTI?

SFTY has an expense ratio of 0.77% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $74 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, SFTY or VTI?

Over the past year SFTY returned +16.90% vs +16.63% for VTI, so SFTY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), SFTY annualized +20.10% vs +20.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SFTY or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 11.4% annualized versus 10.5% for SFTY. Worst drawdown: SFTY -8.6% vs VTI -8.9%.

Should I hold both SFTY and VTI?

SFTY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between SFTY and VTI?

91.8% of SFTY's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 69.3% of VTI's is in holdings SFTY also owns. They hold 162 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in SFTY and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, SFTY or VTI?

SFTY yields 0.17% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than SFTY?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. SFTY led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.