SH vs TSLQ

SH vs TSLQ

Which is better, SH or TSLQ?

SH has been ahead.

SH has a lower expense ratio. SH led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: SHHigher Returns: SH

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSHTSLQ
Expense Ratio0.88%Best1.15%
AUM$964M$92M
Dividend Yield3.92%9.89%
Holdings1612
YTD Return-8.49%-6.17%Best
1Y Return-10.36%Best-19.23%
3Y Return (annualized)-13.82%Best-65.37%
5Y Return (annualized)-8.55%-
Volatility (annualized)13.7%Best86.8%
Max Drawdown-46.4%Best-98.7%
$10,000 over 4.3 years$5,698Best$264
Fund FamilyProSharesTradr ETFs
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleTrading-Inverse EquityTrading-Inverse Equity
InceptionJun 19, 2006Jul 13, 2022

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.3 years).

SH vs TSLQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.3 years both funds cover.

Compare SH against instead:SH vs SPYSH vs QQQSH vs VOOSH vs VTITSLQ against:TSLQ vs VXUS

SH vs TSLQ Performance

ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) is an ETF from ProShares and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs. Over the past year SH returned -10.36% while TSLQ returned -19.23%. Year to date, SH is down 8.49% versus a loss of 6.17% for TSLQ.

Over three years, SH compounded at -13.82% per year against -65.37% for TSLQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, SH has the edge at -12.26% annualized vs -57.06%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TSLQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 86.8% compared with 13.7% for SH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.4% for SH and -98.7% for TSLQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SH charges 0.88% per year while TSLQ charges 1.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $88 vs $115 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SH currently yields 3.92% against 9.89% for TSLQ.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1 holding in SH and 1 in TSLQ, totalling 87.7% and 5.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in SH and 1 in TSLQ, against full books of 16 and 12.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of SH and TSLQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

SHTSLQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SH or TSLQ?

SH has an expense ratio of 0.88% while TSLQ charges 1.15%. SH is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, SH or TSLQ?

Over the past year SH returned -10.36% vs -19.23% for TSLQ, so SH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SH annualized -12.26% vs -57.06% for TSLQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SH or TSLQ?

TSLQ has been the more volatile fund at 86.8% annualized versus 13.7% for SH. Worst drawdown: SH -46.4% vs TSLQ -98.7%.

Should I hold both SH and TSLQ?

SH and TSLQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, SH or TSLQ?

SH yields 3.92% while TSLQ yields 9.89%, so TSLQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TSLQ better than SH?

SH has a lower expense ratio. SH led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.