SIXS vs VTI
ETC 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SIXS or VTI?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SIXS is less concentrated, with 19.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SIXS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $140M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.97% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 169 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +11.68% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.75% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.43% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.08% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.7% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,213 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 19.6%Best | 33.5% |
| Fund Family | 6 Meridian ETF | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 11, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 11, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.4 years).
SIXS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.4 years both funds cover.
SIXS vs VTI Performance
ETC 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) is an ETF from 6 Meridian ETF and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SIXS returned +15.75% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, SIXS is up 11.68% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, SIXS compounded at +11.43% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.08% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +17.15% annualized vs +13.92%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SIXS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 15.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.7% for SIXS and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SIXS charges 0.52% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $3 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SIXS currently yields 1.97% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
97.5% of SIXS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's money is in holdings SIXS also owns.
Most of SIXS is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
82 positions in common, counted across the 85 positions we hold weights for in SIXS and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 169 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,135 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SIXS (97.4% of the fund), and 1 for SIXS that do not appear in VTI (0.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SIXS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. | 2.69% | 0.01% | 2.68% |
| PARRPar Pacific Holdings Inc | 2.57% | 0.01% | 2.56% |
| INVAInnoviva Inc | 2.33% | 0.00% | 2.33% |
| AGOAssured Guaranty Ltd. Common Stock | 2.17% | 0.00% | 2.17% |
| GPORGulfport Energy Corp Common Stock Usd.0001 | 2.06% | 0.00% | 2.06% |
| CALMCal-maine Foods Inc | 2.02% | 0.00% | 2.02% |
| CVICvr Energy, Inc. | 1.53% | 0.00% | 1.53% |
| SIG:LNSignet Jewelers Limited Common Shares | 1.52% | 0.00% | 1.52% |
| PLABPhotronics Inc | 1.35% | 0.00% | 1.35% |
| ASOAcademy Sports And Outdoorsi Nc . | 1.33% | 0.00% | 1.33% |
97.5% of SIXS is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SIXS or VTI?
SIXS has an expense ratio of 0.52% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SIXS or VTI?
Over the past year SIXS returned +15.75% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), SIXS annualized +13.92% vs +17.15% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SIXS or VTI?
SIXS has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 15.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SIXS -27.7% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both SIXS and VTI?
SIXS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SIXS and VTI?
97.5% of SIXS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's is in holdings SIXS also owns. They hold 82 positions in common, counted across the 85 positions we hold weights for in SIXS and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SIXS or VTI?
SIXS yields 1.97% while VTI yields 1.06%, so SIXS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SIXS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SIXS is less concentrated, with 19.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.