SLVY vs VTI
FT Vest Silver Strategy & Target Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SLVY or VTI?
Commodities against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLVY | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.20% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 16 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -8.24% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | -8.24% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 50.4% | 14.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -64.8% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 15.4 years | $3,869 | $59,031Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Commodities | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 8, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 15.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 27, 2011 to Oct 14, 2026 (15.4 years).
SLVY vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.4 years both funds cover.
SLVY vs VTI Performance
FT Vest Silver Strategy & Target Income ETF (SLVY) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLVY returned -8.24% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, SLVY is down 8.24% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLVY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 50.4% compared with 14.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.8% for SLVY and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLVY charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLVY currently yields 1.20% against 1.06% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SLVY and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLVY or VTI?
SLVY has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SLVY or VTI?
Over the past year SLVY returned -8.24% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SLVY annualized -5.98% vs +12.22% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SLVY or VTI?
SLVY has been the more volatile fund at 50.4% annualized versus 14.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SLVY -64.8% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both SLVY and VTI?
SLVY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLVY or VTI?
SLVY yields 1.20% while VTI yields 1.06%, so SLVY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SLVY?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.