SLYG vs VIOG
State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P Small Cap 600 Growth ETF
Which is better, SLYG or VIOG?
Nearly the same fund. VIOG costs less.
VIOG has a lower expense ratio. VIOG led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLYG | VIOG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.10%Best |
| AUM | $4.8B | $1.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 0.79% |
| Holdings | 351 | 353 |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +12.42%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.86% | +13.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +14.81%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.64% | +4.72%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 18.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.0% | -42.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,546 | $12,594Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 9.8%Tie | 9.8%Tie |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Growth | Small Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 25, 2000 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Oct 14, 2026 (16.1 years).
SLYG vs VIOG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.1 years both funds cover.
SLYG vs VIOG Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard S&P Small Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLYG returned +13.86% while VIOG returned +13.95%. Year to date, SLYG is up 12.28% versus a gain of 12.42% for VIOG.
Over three years, SLYG compounded at +14.54% per year against +14.81% for VIOG; over five years the annualized figures are +4.64% and +4.72% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VIOG has the edge at +11.55% annualized vs +10.72%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLYG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 18.4% for VIOG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.0% for SLYG and -42.8% for VIOG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLYG charges 0.15% per year while VIOG charges 0.10%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $10 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLYG currently yields 0.73% against 0.79% for VIOG.
Holdings Overlap
98.9% of SLYG's money is in holdings VIOG also owns. 98.2% of VIOG's money is in holdings SLYG also owns.
Most of SLYG is already inside VIOG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
343 positions in common, counted across the 347 positions we hold weights for in SLYG and 350 in VIOG, against full books of 351 and 353.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 2 positions for VIOG that do not appear in our book for SLYG (0.9% of the fund), and 3 for SLYG that do not appear in VIOG (0.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SLYG | Weight in VIOG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FORMFormfactor, Inc. | 1.39% | 1.39% | 0.00% |
| VSATViasat Inc | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.00% |
| PTGXProtagonist Therapeutics Inc | 1.08% | 1.08% | 0.00% |
| RHPRyman Hospitality Properties | 0.99% | 0.99% | 0.00% |
| TGTXTg Therapeutics Inc Common Stock | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.00% |
| ESEEsco Technologies Inc | 0.85% | 0.85% | 0.00% |
| FSSFederal Signal Corp | 0.85% | 0.85% | 0.00% |
| SNEXStonex Group Inc | 0.85% | 0.85% | 0.00% |
| NPOEnpro Industries Inc | 0.84% | 0.84% | 0.00% |
| ZWSZurn Elkay Water Solutions | 0.84% | 0.84% | 0.00% |
98.9% of SLYG is already inside VIOG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLYG or VIOG?
SLYG has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VIOG charges 0.10%. VIOG is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SLYG or VIOG?
Over the past year SLYG returned +13.86% vs +13.95% for VIOG, so VIOG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SLYG annualized +10.72% vs +11.55% for VIOG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SLYG or VIOG?
SLYG has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 18.4% for VIOG. Worst drawdown: SLYG -43.0% vs VIOG -42.8%.
Should I hold both SLYG and VIOG?
SLYG and VIOG have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SLYG and VIOG?
98.9% of SLYG's money is in holdings VIOG also owns. 98.2% of VIOG's is in holdings SLYG also owns. They hold 343 positions in common, counted across the 347 positions we hold weights for in SLYG and 350 in VIOG.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLYG or VIOG?
SLYG yields 0.73% while VIOG yields 0.79%, so VIOG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VIOG better than SLYG?
VIOG has a lower expense ratio. VIOG led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.