SLYV vs VTI
State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SLYV or VTI?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SLYV led over 1Y and the full window, VTI over 3Y and 5Y. SLYV is less concentrated, with 8.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLYV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4.7B | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.01% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 463 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +12.58% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.84%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.17% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.82% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 44.9% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -63.1% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,269 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 8.5%Best | 33.5% |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 25, 2000 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Oct 14, 2026 (25.4 years).
SLYV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.4 years both funds cover.
SLYV vs VTI Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLYV returned +17.84% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, SLYV is up 12.58% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, SLYV compounded at +15.17% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.82% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, SLYV has the edge at +12.65% annualized vs +8.04%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLYV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 44.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.1% for SLYV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLYV charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLYV currently yields 2.01% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
97.9% of SLYV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.2% of VTI's money is in holdings SLYV also owns.
Most of SLYV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
455 positions in common, counted across the 463 positions we hold weights for in SLYV and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 463 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,035 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SLYV (96.4% of the fund), and 6 for SLYV that do not appear in VTI (1.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SLYV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MTCHMatch Group Inc | 1.02% | 0.01% | 1.01% |
| PAYCPaycom Software Inc . | 0.94% | 0.01% | 0.93% |
| SMSm Energy Co | 0.92% | 0.01% | 0.91% |
| JXNJackson Financial Inc USD | 0.90% | 0.01% | 0.89% |
| KMXCarmax Inc. | 0.86% | 0.01% | 0.85% |
| EMNEastman Chemical Co. | 0.82% | 0.01% | 0.81% |
| VSCOVictoria'S Secret & Co Common Stock USD 0.01 | 0.80% | 0.01% | 0.79% |
| LNCLincoln National Corp. | 0.76% | 0.01% | 0.75% |
| MATXMatson Inc | 0.76% | 0.01% | 0.75% |
| MHKMohawk Industries Inc. | 0.71% | 0.01% | 0.70% |
97.9% of SLYV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLYV or VTI?
SLYV has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SLYV or VTI?
Over the past year SLYV returned +17.84% vs +16.63% for VTI, so SLYV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), SLYV annualized +12.65% vs +8.04% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SLYV or VTI?
SLYV has been the more volatile fund at 44.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SLYV -63.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SLYV and VTI?
SLYV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SLYV and VTI?
97.9% of SLYV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.2% of VTI's is in holdings SLYV also owns. They hold 455 positions in common, counted across the 463 positions we hold weights for in SLYV and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLYV or VTI?
SLYV yields 2.01% while VTI yields 1.06%, so SLYV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SLYV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SLYV led over 1Y and the full window, VTI over 3Y and 5Y. SLYV is less concentrated, with 8.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.