SPUU vs SSO
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF vs ProShares Ultra S&P500
Which is better, SPUU or SSO?
Nearly the same fund. SPUU costs less.
SPUU has a lower expense ratio. SPUU led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, SSO over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPUU | SSO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60%Best | 0.84% |
| AUM | $296M | $9.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.31% | 0.69% |
| Holdings | 1,020 | 521 |
| YTD Return | +22.36%Best | +21.98% |
| 1Y Return | +29.25%Best | +28.56% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +38.29%Best | +37.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +18.51%Best | +17.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.2% | 29.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -59.4% | -59.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $23,376Best | $22,761 |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | ProShares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 28, 2014 | Jun 19, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 28, 2014 to Oct 14, 2026 (12.4 years).
SPUU vs SSO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.4 years both funds cover.
SPUU vs SSO Performance
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year SPUU returned +29.25% while SSO returned +28.56%. Year to date, SPUU is up 22.36% versus a gain of 21.98% for SSO.
Over three years, SPUU compounded at +38.29% per year against +37.60% for SSO; over five years the annualized figures are +18.51% and +17.88% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, SSO has the edge at +20.97% annualized vs +18.43%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPUU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.2% compared with 29.8% for SSO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.4% for SPUU and -59.3% for SSO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPUU charges 0.60% per year while SSO charges 0.84%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $84 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPUU currently yields 1.31% against 0.69% for SSO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 89.3% of SPUU's money is in holdings SSO also owns.
Stated as a floor: for SSO, our book for it covers 82.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of SPUU is already inside SSO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
488 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in SPUU and 504 in SSO, against full books of 1,020 and 521.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SPUU | Weight in SSO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.12% | 5.73% | 1.39% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.82% | 4.93% | 1.89% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.23% | 3.89% | 1.34% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.46% | 2.50% | 0.96% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc Cap Stk Cl A | 2.86% | 2.04% | 0.82% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.28% | 1.71% | 0.57% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc Class C | 2.28% | 1.64% | 0.64% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.04% | 1.62% | 0.42% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.45% | 1.23% | 0.22% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 1.41% | 1.06% | 0.35% |
89.3% of SPUU is already inside SSO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPUU or SSO?
SPUU has an expense ratio of 0.60% while SSO charges 0.84%. SPUU is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SPUU or SSO?
Over the past year SPUU returned +29.25% vs +28.56% for SSO, so SPUU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), SPUU annualized +18.43% vs +20.97% for SSO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SPUU or SSO?
SPUU has been the more volatile fund at 30.2% annualized versus 29.8% for SSO. Worst drawdown: SPUU -59.4% vs SSO -59.3%.
Should I hold both SPUU and SSO?
SPUU and SSO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SPUU and SSO?
At least 89.3% of SPUU's money is in holdings SSO also owns. Our book for SSO is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 488 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in SPUU and 504 in SSO.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPUU or SSO?
SPUU yields 1.31% while SSO yields 0.69%, so SPUU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SSO better than SPUU?
SPUU has a lower expense ratio. SPUU led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, SSO over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.