SPY vs ZINN

SPY vs ZINN

Which is better, SPY or ZINN?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.1%.

Lower Fees: SPYHigher Returns (1Y): SPYLess Concentrated: SPY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSPYZINN
Expense Ratio0.09%Best0.75%
AUM$823.2B$126M
Dividend Yield0.99%0.00%
Holdings1,51570
YTD Return+13.53%Best-2.67%
1Y Return+17.47%-
3Y Return (annualized)+22.36%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.21%-
Top 10 Weight38.2%Best52.1%
Fund FamilyState Street Investment ManagementVirtus Investment Partners
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJan 22, 1993Aug 31, 2015

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

SPY vs ZINN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

SPY vs ZINN Performance

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth ETF (ZINN) is an ETF from Virtus Investment Partners. Year to date, SPY is up 13.53% versus a loss of 2.67% for ZINN.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SPY charges 0.09% per year while ZINN charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $75 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPY currently yields 0.99% against 0.00% for ZINN.

Holdings Overlap

SPY already in ZINN26.8%
ZINN already in SPY58.7%

26.8% of SPY's money is in holdings ZINN also owns. 58.7% of ZINN's money is in holdings SPY also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

16 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in SPY and 33 in ZINN, against full books of 1,515 and 70.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 13 positions for ZINN that do not appear in our book for SPY (28.8% of the fund), and 480 for SPY that do not appear in ZINN (72.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SPYWeight in ZINNDifference
NVDANvidia Corp7.78%8.63%0.85%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.71%2.97%2.74%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.78%4.62%0.84%
TSLATesla Inc1.54%6.17%4.63%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.22%6.38%5.16%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.12%3.89%0.77%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.22%2.82%0.60%
CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc0.36%3.66%3.30%
PWRQuanta Services Inc0.14%3.62%3.48%
MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc0.09%3.09%3.00%

58.7% of ZINN is already inside SPY.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SPYZINN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SPY or ZINN?

SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09% while ZINN charges 0.75%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between SPY and ZINN?

58.7% of ZINN's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 58.7% of ZINN's is in holdings SPY also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in SPY and 33 in ZINN.

Which pays a higher dividend, SPY or ZINN?

SPY yields 0.99% while ZINN yields 0.00%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZINN better than SPY?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.