SRV vs VTI
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SRV or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SRV led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 4.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $298M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 18.58% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 73 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +19.58%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +19.03%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.88% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +19.44%Best | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.4% | 16.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -56.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $24,308Best | $17,616 |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.1% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Cushing Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 27, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 27, 2007 to Oct 14, 2026 (19.1 years).
SRV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.1 years both funds cover.
SRV vs VTI Performance
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) is an ETF from Cushing Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRV returned +19.03% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, SRV is up 19.58% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, SRV compounded at +21.88% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +19.44% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.44% annualized vs -15.07%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.4% compared with 16.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRV charges 4.25% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $425 vs $3 annually, a gap of $422 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRV currently yields 18.58% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
63.6% of SRV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.0% of VTI's money is in holdings SRV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, SRV as of Jun 30, 2026 and VTI as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
37 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in SRV and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 73 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,126 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SRV (95.5% of the fund), and 13 for SRV that do not appear in VTI (22.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SRV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 5.10% | 0.12% | 4.98% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 4.85% | 0.09% | 4.76% |
| BECfd Bloom Energy Corp- A | 4.02% | 0.08% | 3.94% |
| DTMDT Midstream Inc | 3.83% | 0.02% | 3.81% |
| LNGCheniere Energy Inc. | 3.23% | 0.08% | 3.15% |
| KNTKAltus Midstream Company | 3.14% | 0.00% | 3.14% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 2.98% | 0.08% | 2.90% |
| VSTVistra Energy Corp. | 2.87% | 0.06% | 2.81% |
| NRGNrg Energy | 2.84% | 0.03% | 2.81% |
| TLNTalen Energy Corp Common Stock USD.001 | 2.72% | 0.02% | 2.70% |
63.6% of SRV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRV or VTI?
SRV has an expense ratio of 4.25% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $422 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SRV or VTI?
Over the past year SRV returned +19.03% vs +16.63% for VTI, so SRV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), SRV annualized -15.07% vs +9.44% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SRV or VTI?
SRV has been the more volatile fund at 39.4% annualized versus 16.0% for VTI.
Should I hold both SRV and VTI?
SRV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SRV and VTI?
63.6% of SRV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.0% of VTI's is in holdings SRV also owns. They hold 37 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in SRV and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRV or VTI?
SRV yields 18.58% while VTI yields 1.06%, so SRV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SRV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SRV led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.