SRVR vs VOO
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SRVR or VOO?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRVR | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $301M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 4.87% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 140 | 506 |
| YTD Return | -0.74% | +13.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | -6.95% | +17.55%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.02% | +22.46%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.96% | +13.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.9% | 16.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -41.0% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,171 | $18,654Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 70.0% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 16, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8.4 years).
SRVR vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.4 years both funds cover.
SRVR vs VOO Performance
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRVR returned -6.95% while VOO returned +17.55%. Year to date, SRVR is down 0.74% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.
Over three years, SRVR compounded at +5.02% per year against +22.46% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -3.96% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.24% annualized vs +3.25%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 16.5% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.0% for SRVR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRVR charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRVR currently yields 4.87% against 1.06% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
60.9% of SRVR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 2.5% of VOO's money is in holdings SRVR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in SRVR and 504 in VOO, against full books of 140 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 487 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SRVR (97.2% of the fund), and 18 for SRVR that do not appear in VOO (11.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SRVR | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust | 15.91% | 0.16% | 15.75% |
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc. | 15.24% | 0.10% | 15.14% |
| AMTAmerican Tower Corporation | 14.68% | 0.12% | 14.56% |
| IRMIron Mtn Inc New Com Npv | 4.75% | 0.05% | 4.70% |
| CCICrown Castle International Corp | 4.24% | 0.05% | 4.19% |
| SBACSba Communications Corp. | 4.13% | 0.03% | 4.10% |
| VVERDERA ENERGY CORP | 0.02% | 0.93% | 0.91% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | 0.67% | 0.15% | 0.52% |
| GEVGE Vernova Inc. CDR (CAD Hedged) | 0.31% | 0.37% | 0.06% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 0.48% | 0.13% | 0.35% |
60.9% of SRVR is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRVR or VOO?
SRVR has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SRVR or VOO?
Over the past year SRVR returned -6.95% vs +17.55% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), SRVR annualized +3.25% vs +14.24% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SRVR or VOO?
SRVR has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 16.5% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SRVR -41.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SRVR and VOO?
SRVR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SRVR and VOO?
60.9% of SRVR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 2.5% of VOO's is in holdings SRVR also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in SRVR and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRVR or VOO?
SRVR yields 4.87% while VOO yields 1.06%, so SRVR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SRVR?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.