SSO vs TUG
ProShares Ultra S&P500 vs STF Tactical Growth ETF
Which is better, SSO or TUG?
SSO has been ahead.
TUG has a lower expense ratio. SSO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SSO | TUG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.84% | 0.65%Best |
| AUM | $9.2B | $35M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 1.88% |
| Holdings | 521 | 204 |
| YTD Return | +21.98%Best | +19.37% |
| 1Y Return | +28.56%Best | +22.88% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +37.60%Best | +22.50% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.88% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.5% | 16.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.2% | -22.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.4 years | $30,060Best | $20,638 |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Shelton Capital Management |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jun 19, 2006 | May 18, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 20, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.4 years).
SSO vs TUG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.
SSO vs TUG Performance
ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) is an ETF from ProShares and STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) is an ETF from Shelton Capital Management. Over the past year SSO returned +28.56% while TUG returned +22.88%. Year to date, SSO is up 21.98% versus a gain of 19.37% for TUG.
Over three years, SSO compounded at +37.60% per year against +22.50% for TUG. Across the full 4-year window we track, SSO has the edge at +28.42% annualized vs +17.90%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SSO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.5% compared with 16.3% for TUG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.2% for SSO and -22.3% for TUG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SSO charges 0.84% per year while TUG charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $84 vs $65 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SSO currently yields 0.69% against 1.88% for TUG.
Holdings Overlap
At least 95.3% of TUG's money is in holdings SSO also owns.
Stated as a floor: for SSO, our book for it covers 82.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of TUG is already inside SSO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
88 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in SSO and 101 in TUG, against full books of 521 and 204.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SSO | Weight in TUG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.73% | 9.04% | 3.31% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.93% | 8.16% | 3.23% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.89% | 6.35% | 2.46% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.23% | 5.90% | 4.67% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.50% | 4.33% | 1.83% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.05% | 4.56% | 3.51% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 2.04% | 3.26% | 1.22% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 1.64% | 2.99% | 1.35% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.71% | 2.69% | 0.98% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.62% | 2.66% | 1.04% |
95.3% of TUG is already inside SSO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SSO or TUG?
SSO has an expense ratio of 0.84% while TUG charges 0.65%. TUG is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SSO or TUG?
Over the past year SSO returned +28.56% vs +22.88% for TUG, so SSO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SSO annualized +28.42% vs +17.90% for TUG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SSO or TUG?
SSO has been the more volatile fund at 30.5% annualized versus 16.3% for TUG. Worst drawdown: SSO -35.2% vs TUG -22.3%.
Should I hold both SSO and TUG?
SSO and TUG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SSO and TUG?
At least 95.3% of TUG's money is in holdings SSO also owns. Our book for SSO is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 88 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in SSO and 101 in TUG.
Which pays a higher dividend, SSO or TUG?
SSO yields 0.69% while TUG yields 1.88%, so TUG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TUG better than SSO?
TUG has a lower expense ratio. SSO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.