SSS vs VTI
CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SSS or VTI?
VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SSS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $587,878.17 | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 916 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +11.22% | +14.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.47% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.62% |
| Fund Family | Cyber Hornet ETF | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
SSS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SSS vs VTI Performance
CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (SSS) is an ETF from Cyber Hornet ETF and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, SSS is up 11.22% versus a gain of 14.35% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SSS charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SSS currently yields 0.08% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 86.7% of VTI's money is in holdings SSS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for SSS, our book for it covers 56.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of VTI is already inside SSS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, SSS as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
448 positions in common, counted across the 454 positions we hold weights for in SSS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 916 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SSS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.60% | 6.40% | 1.80% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.20% | 6.29% | 2.09% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.20% | 4.79% | 1.59% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.14% | 3.65% | 1.51% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.69% | 2.90% | 1.21% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.48% | 2.56% | 1.08% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 1.35% | 2.31% | 0.96% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.28% | 1.70% | 0.42% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.97% | 1.29% | 0.32% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.85% | 1.31% | 0.46% |
86.7% of VTI is already inside SSS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SSS or VTI?
SSS has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between SSS and VTI?
At least 86.7% of VTI's money is in holdings SSS also owns. Our book for SSS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 448 positions in common, counted across the 454 positions we hold weights for in SSS and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SSS or VTI?
SSS yields 0.08% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SSS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.