TALV vs VMAX
Transamerica Large Value Active ETF vs Hartford US Value ETF
Which is better, TALV or VMAX?
VMAX costs less.
VMAX has a lower expense ratio. VMAX is less concentrated, with 19.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TALV | VMAX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.29%Best |
| AUM | $178M | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 2.17% |
| Holdings | 70 | 127 |
| YTD Return | +14.25% | +16.66%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +21.02% |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.5% | 19.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Transamerica | Hartford Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2025 | Dec 5, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
TALV vs VMAX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
TALV vs VMAX Performance
Transamerica Large Value Active ETF (TALV) is an ETF from Transamerica and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) is an ETF from Hartford Funds. Year to date, TALV is up 14.25% versus a gain of 16.66% for VMAX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TALV charges 0.49% per year while VMAX charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $29 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TALV currently yields 0.73% against 2.17% for VMAX.
Holdings Overlap
51.5% of TALV's money is in holdings VMAX also owns. 26.1% of VMAX's money is in holdings TALV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
27 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in TALV and 125 in VMAX, against full books of 70 and 127.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 68 and 125 positions we hold weights for.
VMAX holds 95 positions TALV does not, 72.6% of the fund.
Largest: ELV 1.94%, TGT 1.93%, BMY 1.91%, MA 1.87%, V 1.86%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TALV | Weight in VMAX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.22% | 1.32% | 3.90% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.51% | 0.59% | 4.92% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.28% | 0.31% | 4.97% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.00% | 0.97% | 3.03% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 2.97% | 1.06% | 1.91% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.59% | 1.98% | 0.39% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.63% | 1.86% | 0.23% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 2.00% | 1.29% | 0.71% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 1.88% | 1.30% | 0.58% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 1.48% | 1.61% | 0.13% |
51.5% of TALV is already inside VMAX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TALV or VMAX?
TALV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VMAX charges 0.29%. VMAX is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between TALV and VMAX?
51.5% of TALV's money is in holdings VMAX also owns. 26.1% of VMAX's is in holdings TALV also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in TALV and 125 in VMAX.
Which pays a higher dividend, TALV or VMAX?
TALV yields 0.73% while VMAX yields 2.17%, so VMAX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VMAX better than TALV?
VMAX has a lower expense ratio. VMAX is less concentrated, with 19.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.