TCHP vs TFGZ

TCHP vs TFGZ

Which is better, TCHP or TFGZ?

TFGZ has been ahead.

TCHP has a lower expense ratio. TFGZ led over 1Y. TFGZ is less concentrated, with 49.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%.

Lower Fees: TCHPHigher Returns (1Y): TFGZLess Concentrated: TFGZ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTCHPTFGZ
Expense Ratio0.57%Best0.79%
AUM$2.2B$12M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings6543
YTD Return+2.74%+16.33%Best
1Y Return+5.10%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.81%-
5Y Return (annualized)+9.18%-
Top 10 Weight59.3%49.4%Best
Fund FamilyT.Rowe PriceThornburg Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionAug 4, 2020Apr 1, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

TCHP vs TFGZ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare TCHP against instead:TCHP vs SPYTCHP vs QQQTCHP vs VOOTCHP vs VTITFGZ against:TFGZ vs VXUS

TCHP vs TFGZ Performance

T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price and Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF (TFGZ) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management. Year to date, TCHP is up 2.74% versus a gain of 16.33% for TFGZ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TCHP charges 0.57% per year while TFGZ charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $79 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TCHP currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for TFGZ.

Holdings Overlap

TCHP already in TFGZ27.6%
TFGZ already in TCHP43.9%

27.6% of TCHP's money is in holdings TFGZ also owns. 43.9% of TFGZ's money is in holdings TCHP also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

10 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in TCHP and 42 in TFGZ, against full books of 65 and 43.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 25 positions for TFGZ that do not appear in our book for TCHP (42.5% of the fund), and 49 for TCHP that do not appear in TFGZ (69.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in TCHPWeight in TFGZDifference
GOOGLAlphabet Inc5.50%12.16%6.66%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.92%7.18%1.26%
AVGOBroadcom Inc5.79%6.00%0.21%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.53%3.77%0.24%
MAMastercard Inc1.99%3.34%1.35%
LRCXLam Research Corp1.73%3.30%1.57%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.33%3.40%2.07%
DDOGDatadog Inc0.27%2.20%1.93%
SHOP:CAShopify Inc0.86%1.43%0.57%
MRVLMarvell Technology Inc0.73%1.08%0.35%

43.9% of TFGZ is already inside TCHP.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

TCHPTFGZ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TCHP or TFGZ?

TCHP has an expense ratio of 0.57% while TFGZ charges 0.79%. TCHP is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between TCHP and TFGZ?

43.9% of TFGZ's money is in holdings TCHP also owns. 43.9% of TFGZ's is in holdings TCHP also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in TCHP and 42 in TFGZ.

Which pays a higher dividend, TCHP or TFGZ?

TCHP yields 0.00% while TFGZ yields 0.00%, so TFGZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TFGZ better than TCHP?

TCHP has a lower expense ratio. TFGZ led over 1Y. TFGZ is less concentrated, with 49.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.