TFGZ vs WINN

TFGZ vs WINN

Which is better, TFGZ or WINN?

TFGZ has been ahead.

WINN has a lower expense ratio. TFGZ led over 1Y. TFGZ is less concentrated, with 49.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%.

Lower Fees: WINNHigher Returns (1Y): TFGZLess Concentrated: TFGZ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTFGZWINN
Expense Ratio0.79%0.57%Best
AUM$12M$1.3B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings43146
YTD Return+16.33%Best+11.03%
1Y Return-+11.42%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.98%
Top 10 Weight49.4%Best57.5%
Fund FamilyThornburg Investment ManagementHarbor Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionApr 1, 2026Feb 2, 2022

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

TFGZ vs WINN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare TFGZ against instead:TFGZ vs SPYTFGZ vs QQQTFGZ vs VOOTFGZ vs VTIWINN against:WINN vs VXUS

TFGZ vs WINN Performance

Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF (TFGZ) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management and Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, TFGZ is up 16.33% versus a gain of 11.03% for WINN.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TFGZ charges 0.79% per year while WINN charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $57 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TFGZ currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for WINN.

Holdings Overlap

TFGZ already in WINN51.4%
WINN already in TFGZ30.6%

51.4% of TFGZ's money is in holdings WINN also owns. 30.6% of WINN's money is in holdings TFGZ also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

13 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in TFGZ and 74 in WINN, against full books of 43 and 146.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 58 positions for WINN that do not appear in our book for TFGZ (68.2% of the fund), and 23 for TFGZ that do not appear in WINN (38.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in TFGZWeight in WINNDifference
GOOGLAlphabet Inc12.16%8.02%4.14%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp7.18%6.21%0.97%
AVGOBroadcom Inc6.00%5.40%0.60%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.77%3.89%0.12%
MAMastercard Inc3.34%2.66%0.68%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.3.40%0.76%2.64%
CRDO:KYCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd3.88%0.22%3.66%
LRCXLam Research Corp3.30%0.73%2.57%
DDOGDatadog Inc2.20%1.09%1.11%
VRTVertiv Holdings Co2.62%0.28%2.34%

51.4% of TFGZ is already inside WINN.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

TFGZWINN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TFGZ or WINN?

TFGZ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while WINN charges 0.57%. WINN is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between TFGZ and WINN?

51.4% of TFGZ's money is in holdings WINN also owns. 30.6% of WINN's is in holdings TFGZ also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in TFGZ and 74 in WINN.

Which pays a higher dividend, TFGZ or WINN?

TFGZ yields 0.00% while WINN yields 0.00%, so WINN currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is WINN better than TFGZ?

WINN has a lower expense ratio. TFGZ led over 1Y. TFGZ is less concentrated, with 49.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.