TFGZ vs XOVR
Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF vs ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Which is better, TFGZ or XOVR?
TFGZ has been ahead.
TFGZ has a lower expense ratio. TFGZ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TFGZ | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 1.81% |
| AUM | $12M | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 43 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +16.33%Best | +6.41% |
| 1Y Return | - | +1.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.10% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.66% |
| Fund Family | Thornburg Investment Management | ERShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Apr 1, 2026 | Nov 7, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
TFGZ vs XOVR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
TFGZ vs XOVR Performance
Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF (TFGZ) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) is an ETF from ERShares. Year to date, TFGZ is up 16.33% versus a gain of 6.41% for XOVR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TFGZ charges 0.79% per year while XOVR charges 1.81%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $181 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TFGZ currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XOVR.
Holdings Overlap
At least 21.6% of TFGZ's money is in holdings XOVR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for XOVR, our book for it covers 77.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
TFGZ and XOVR share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in TFGZ and 30 in XOVR, against full books of 43 and 33.
21.6% of TFGZ is already inside XOVR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TFGZ or XOVR?
TFGZ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while XOVR charges 1.81%. TFGZ is the cheaper option, by $102 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between TFGZ and XOVR?
At least 21.6% of TFGZ's money is in holdings XOVR also owns. Our book for XOVR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in TFGZ and 30 in XOVR.
Which pays a higher dividend, TFGZ or XOVR?
TFGZ yields 0.00% while XOVR yields 0.00%, so XOVR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XOVR better than TFGZ?
TFGZ has a lower expense ratio. TFGZ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.