THOR vs URTH
Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF vs iShares MSCI World ETF
Which is better, THOR or URTH?
URTH costs less.
URTH has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | THOR | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.24%Best |
| AUM | $38M | $8.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 1.38% |
| Holdings | 59 | 1,310 |
| YTD Return | +0.77% | +11.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.36% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.92% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.34% |
| Fund Family | Thornburg Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 22, 2026 | Jan 10, 2012 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
THOR vs URTH growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
THOR vs URTH Performance
Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF (THOR) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, THOR is up 0.77% versus a gain of 11.87% for URTH.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
THOR charges 0.79% per year while URTH charges 0.24%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $24 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, THOR currently yields 0.43% against 1.38% for URTH.
Holdings Overlap
At least 5.6% of URTH's money is in holdings THOR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for THOR, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
URTH and THOR share little of their money.
28 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in THOR and 1,220 in URTH, against full books of 59 and 1,310.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in THOR | Weight in URTH | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.73% | 1.71% | 1.02% |
| KMBKimberly-Clark Corp. | 3.31% | 0.03% | 3.28% |
| TAT&T Inc. | 2.93% | 0.19% | 2.74% |
| BT.A:LNBt Group Plc | 2.88% | 0.02% | 2.86% |
| ENEL:MIEnel | 2.77% | 0.08% | 2.69% |
| NN:ASNn Group Nv | 2.61% | 0.02% | 2.59% |
| AZN:LNAstraZeneca PLC | 2.21% | 0.27% | 1.94% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.99% | 0.39% | 1.60% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.79% | 0.51% | 1.28% |
| 0N9G:LNEndesa Sa - Common | 2.26% | 0.02% | 2.24% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of THOR and URTH you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, THOR or URTH?
THOR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while URTH charges 0.24%. URTH is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between THOR and URTH?
At least 5.6% of URTH's money is in holdings THOR also owns. Our book for THOR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in THOR and 1,220 in URTH.
Which pays a higher dividend, THOR or URTH?
THOR yields 0.43% while URTH yields 1.38%, so URTH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is URTH better than THOR?
URTH has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.