TJAN vs TSLY
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to January 2027 vs YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
Which is better, TJAN or TSLY?
TJAN has been ahead.
TJAN has a lower expense ratio. TJAN led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TJAN | TSLY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 1.07% |
| AUM | $32M | $677M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 99.27% |
| Holdings | 15 | 34 |
| YTD Return | +5.01%Best | -12.87% |
| 1Y Return | +6.30%Best | -9.45% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +6.07% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.2%Best | 41.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -4.8%Best | -42.2% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $11,295Best | $10,255 |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | YieldMax ETF |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2024 | Nov 22, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 2, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
TJAN vs TSLY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
TJAN vs TSLY Performance
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to January 2027 (TJAN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year TJAN returned +6.30% while TSLY returned -9.45%. Year to date, TJAN is up 5.01% versus a loss of 12.87% for TSLY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TSLY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 41.5% compared with 3.2% for TJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.8% for TJAN and -42.2% for TSLY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TJAN charges 0.79% per year while TSLY charges 1.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $107 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TJAN currently yields 0.00% against 99.27% for TSLY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of TJAN and TSLY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TJAN or TSLY?
TJAN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while TSLY charges 1.07%. TJAN is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TJAN or TSLY?
Over the past year TJAN returned +6.30% vs -9.45% for TSLY, so TJAN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), TJAN annualized +7.00% vs +1.41% for TSLY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TJAN or TSLY?
TSLY has been the more volatile fund at 41.5% annualized versus 3.2% for TJAN. Worst drawdown: TJAN -4.8% vs TSLY -42.2%.
Should I hold both TJAN and TSLY?
TJAN and TSLY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, TJAN or TSLY?
TJAN yields 0.00% while TSLY yields 99.27%, so TSLY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TSLY better than TJAN?
TJAN has a lower expense ratio. TJAN led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.