TJUL vs ZALT
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to July 2027 vs Innovator US Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
Which is better, TJUL or ZALT?
ZALT has been ahead.
ZALT has a lower expense ratio. ZALT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TJUL | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.69%Best |
| AUM | $115M | $794M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 15 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +3.68% | +6.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.83% | +9.12%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.68% | +10.33%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.1%Best | 3.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -4.6%Best | -8.2% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $12,545 | $13,518Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jul 18, 2023 | Oct 2, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 2, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).
TJUL vs ZALT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
TJUL vs ZALT Performance
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to July 2027 (TJUL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator US Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year TJUL returned +4.83% while ZALT returned +9.12%. Year to date, TJUL is up 3.68% versus a gain of 6.44% for ZALT.
Over three years, TJUL compounded at +7.68% per year against +10.33% for ZALT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZALT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 3.8% compared with 3.1% for TJUL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.6% for TJUL and -8.2% for ZALT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TJUL charges 0.79% per year while ZALT charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $69 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TJUL currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for ZALT.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of TJUL and ZALT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TJUL or ZALT?
TJUL has an expense ratio of 0.79% while ZALT charges 0.69%. ZALT is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TJUL or ZALT?
Over the past year TJUL returned +4.83% vs +9.12% for ZALT, so ZALT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TJUL or ZALT?
ZALT has been the more volatile fund at 3.8% annualized versus 3.1% for TJUL. Worst drawdown: TJUL -4.6% vs ZALT -8.2%.
Should I hold both TJUL and ZALT?
TJUL and ZALT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, TJUL or ZALT?
TJUL yields 0.00% while ZALT yields 0.00%, so ZALT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZALT better than TJUL?
ZALT has a lower expense ratio. ZALT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.