TMSF vs VXUS
T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, TMSF or VXUS?
VXUS has been ahead.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TMSF | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $59M | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.79% | 2.34% |
| Holdings | 829 | 8,844 |
| YTD Return | +0.89% | +10.00%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.07% | +17.01%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.55% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.55% |
| Fund Family | T.Rowe Price | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
TMSF vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
TMSF vs VXUS Performance
T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF (TMSF) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TMSF returned +2.07% while VXUS returned +17.01%. Year to date, TMSF is up 0.89% versus a gain of 10.00% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TMSF charges 0.37% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $5 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TMSF currently yields 4.79% against 2.34% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 125 holdings in TMSF and 8,425 in VXUS, totalling 37.7% and 91.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 125 positions we hold weights for in TMSF and 8,425 in VXUS, against full books of 829 and 8,844.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of TMSF and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TMSF or VXUS?
TMSF has an expense ratio of 0.37% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TMSF or VXUS?
Over the past year TMSF returned +2.07% vs +17.01% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, TMSF or VXUS?
TMSF yields 4.79% while VXUS yields 2.34%, so TMSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than TMSF?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.