TQQQ vs XQQI
ProShares UltraPro QQQ vs NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
Which is better, TQQQ or XQQI?
TQQQ costs less.
TQQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TQQQ | XQQI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78%Best | 0.98% |
| AUM | $38.3B | $381M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.62% | 11.96% |
| Holdings | 128 | 213 |
| YTD Return | +42.42%Best | +14.06% |
| 1Y Return | +47.68% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +58.33% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +18.53% | - |
| Fund Family | ProShares | NEOS |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Feb 9, 2010 | Feb 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
TQQQ vs XQQI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
TQQQ vs XQQI Performance
ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) is an ETF from ProShares and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) is an ETF from NEOS. Year to date, TQQQ is up 42.42% versus a gain of 14.06% for XQQI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TQQQ charges 0.78% per year while XQQI charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $98 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TQQQ currently yields 0.62% against 11.96% for XQQI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 98.5% of XQQI's money is in holdings TQQQ also owns.
Stated as a floor: for TQQQ, our book for it covers 50.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of XQQI is already inside TQQQ. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
97 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in TQQQ and 102 in XQQI, against full books of 128 and 213.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TQQQ | Weight in XQQI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 2.74% | 8.55% | 5.81% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.37% | 7.42% | 5.05% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 1.87% | 5.76% | 3.89% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 5.27% | 3.64% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.39% | 4.29% | 2.90% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.32% | 4.13% | 2.81% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 1.05% | 3.32% | 2.27% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc Cap Stk Cl A | 0.98% | 3.04% | 2.06% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc Class C | 0.91% | 2.82% | 1.91% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 0.95% | 2.74% | 1.79% |
98.5% of XQQI is already inside TQQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TQQQ or XQQI?
TQQQ has an expense ratio of 0.78% while XQQI charges 0.98%. TQQQ is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between TQQQ and XQQI?
At least 98.5% of XQQI's money is in holdings TQQQ also owns. Our book for TQQQ is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 97 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in TQQQ and 102 in XQQI.
Which pays a higher dividend, TQQQ or XQQI?
TQQQ yields 0.62% while XQQI yields 11.96%, so XQQI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XQQI better than TQQQ?
TQQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.