TSLY vs XBJA

TSLY vs XBJA

Which is better, TSLY or XBJA?

XBJA has been ahead.

XBJA has a lower expense ratio. XBJA led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: XBJAHigher Returns: XBJA

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTSLYXBJA
Expense Ratio1.07%0.79%Best
AUM$677M$94M
Dividend Yield99.27%0.00%
Holdings3421
YTD Return-12.87%+8.88%Best
1Y Return-9.45%+11.38%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+6.07%+11.68%Best
Volatility (annualized)45.6%6.4%Best
Max Drawdown-49.5%-12.6%Best
$10,000 over 3.9 years$13,603$15,289Best
Fund FamilyYieldMax ETFInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionNov 22, 2022Dec 31, 2021

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 23, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.9 years).

TSLY vs XBJA growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.

Compare TSLY against instead:TSLY vs SPYTSLY vs QQQTSLY vs VOOTSLY vs VTIXBJA against:XBJA vs VXUS

TSLY vs XBJA Performance

YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year TSLY returned -9.45% while XBJA returned +11.38%. Year to date, TSLY is down 12.87% versus a gain of 8.88% for XBJA.

Over three years, TSLY compounded at +6.07% per year against +11.68% for XBJA. Across the full 4-year window we track, XBJA has the edge at +11.50% annualized vs +8.21%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TSLY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 45.6% compared with 6.4% for XBJA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.5% for TSLY and -12.6% for XBJA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TSLY charges 1.07% per year while XBJA charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $79 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TSLY currently yields 99.27% against 0.00% for XBJA.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of TSLY and XBJA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

TSLYXBJA

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TSLY or XBJA?

TSLY has an expense ratio of 1.07% while XBJA charges 0.79%. XBJA is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, TSLY or XBJA?

Over the past year TSLY returned -9.45% vs +11.38% for XBJA, so XBJA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TSLY annualized +8.21% vs +11.50% for XBJA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, TSLY or XBJA?

TSLY has been the more volatile fund at 45.6% annualized versus 6.4% for XBJA. Worst drawdown: TSLY -49.5% vs XBJA -12.6%.

Should I hold both TSLY and XBJA?

TSLY and XBJA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, TSLY or XBJA?

TSLY yields 99.27% while XBJA yields 0.00%, so TSLY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XBJA better than TSLY?

XBJA has a lower expense ratio. XBJA led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.