TUG vs UPRO
STF Tactical Growth ETF vs ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
Which is better, TUG or UPRO?
UPRO has been ahead.
TUG has a lower expense ratio. UPRO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TUG | UPRO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65%Best | 0.88% |
| AUM | $35M | $5.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.88% | 0.77% |
| Holdings | 204 | 520 |
| YTD Return | +19.37% | +29.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | +22.88% | +38.25%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.50% | +51.43%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3%Best | 46.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.3%Best | -49.1% |
| $10,000 over 4.4 years | $20,638 | $38,301Best |
| Fund Family | Shelton Capital Management | ProShares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 18, 2022 | Jun 23, 2009 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 20, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.4 years).
TUG vs UPRO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.
TUG vs UPRO Performance
STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) is an ETF from Shelton Capital Management and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year TUG returned +22.88% while UPRO returned +38.25%. Year to date, TUG is up 19.37% versus a gain of 29.25% for UPRO.
Over three years, TUG compounded at +22.50% per year against +51.43% for UPRO. Across the full 4-year window we track, UPRO has the edge at +35.69% annualized vs +17.90%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UPRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 46.1% compared with 16.3% for TUG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.3% for TUG and -49.1% for UPRO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TUG charges 0.65% per year while UPRO charges 0.88%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $88 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TUG currently yields 1.88% against 0.77% for UPRO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 95.3% of TUG's money is in holdings UPRO also owns.
Stated as a floor: for UPRO, our book for it covers 72.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of TUG is already inside UPRO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
88 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in TUG and 502 in UPRO, against full books of 204 and 520.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TUG | Weight in UPRO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.04% | 4.01% | 5.03% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 8.16% | 3.83% | 4.33% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.35% | 2.94% | 3.41% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 5.90% | 0.82% | 5.08% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.33% | 1.95% | 2.38% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.56% | 0.63% | 3.93% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.26% | 1.61% | 1.65% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.99% | 1.28% | 1.71% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.69% | 1.28% | 1.41% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.66% | 1.15% | 1.51% |
95.3% of TUG is already inside UPRO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TUG or UPRO?
TUG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while UPRO charges 0.88%. TUG is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TUG or UPRO?
Over the past year TUG returned +22.88% vs +38.25% for UPRO, so UPRO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TUG annualized +17.90% vs +35.69% for UPRO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TUG or UPRO?
UPRO has been the more volatile fund at 46.1% annualized versus 16.3% for TUG. Worst drawdown: TUG -22.3% vs UPRO -49.1%.
Should I hold both TUG and UPRO?
TUG and UPRO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TUG and UPRO?
At least 95.3% of TUG's money is in holdings UPRO also owns. Our book for UPRO is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 88 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in TUG and 502 in UPRO.
Which pays a higher dividend, TUG or UPRO?
TUG yields 1.88% while UPRO yields 0.77%, so TUG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UPRO better than TUG?
TUG has a lower expense ratio. UPRO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.