TUG vs XYLD
STF Tactical Growth ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
Which is better, TUG or XYLD?
TUG has been ahead.
XYLD has a lower expense ratio. TUG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. XYLD is less concentrated, with 39.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TUG | XYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.60%Best |
| AUM | $35M | $3.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.88% | 10.44% |
| Holdings | 204 | 1,014 |
| YTD Return | +19.37%Best | +11.42% |
| 1Y Return | +22.88%Best | +18.43% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.50%Best | +13.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.59% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 8.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.3% | -16.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.4 years | $20,638Best | $15,467 |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.9% | 39.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Shelton Capital Management | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 18, 2022 | Jun 21, 2013 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 20, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.4 years).
TUG vs XYLD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.
TUG vs XYLD Performance
STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) is an ETF from Shelton Capital Management and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year TUG returned +22.88% while XYLD returned +18.43%. Year to date, TUG is up 19.37% versus a gain of 11.42% for XYLD.
Over three years, TUG compounded at +22.50% per year against +13.38% for XYLD. Across the full 4-year window we track, TUG has the edge at +17.90% annualized vs +10.42%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 8.3% for XYLD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.3% for TUG and -16.1% for XYLD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TUG charges 0.65% per year while XYLD charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $60 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TUG currently yields 1.88% against 10.44% for XYLD.
Holdings Overlap
95.3% of TUG's money is in holdings XYLD also owns. 56.4% of XYLD's money is in holdings TUG also owns.
Most of TUG is already inside XYLD. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
88 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in TUG and 496 in XYLD, against full books of 204 and 1,014.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 404 positions for XYLD that do not appear in our book for TUG (44.8% of the fund), and 8 for TUG that do not appear in XYLD (1.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TUG | Weight in XYLD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.04% | 8.64% | 0.40% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 8.16% | 7.44% | 0.72% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.35% | 5.87% | 0.48% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.33% | 3.77% | 0.56% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 5.90% | 1.86% | 4.04% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.26% | 3.07% | 0.19% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.56% | 1.58% | 2.98% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.99% | 2.46% | 0.53% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.69% | 2.58% | 0.11% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.66% | 2.46% | 0.20% |
95.3% of TUG is already inside XYLD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TUG or XYLD?
TUG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while XYLD charges 0.60%. XYLD is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TUG or XYLD?
Over the past year TUG returned +22.88% vs +18.43% for XYLD, so TUG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TUG annualized +17.90% vs +10.42% for XYLD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TUG or XYLD?
TUG has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 8.3% for XYLD. Worst drawdown: TUG -22.3% vs XYLD -16.1%.
Should I hold both TUG and XYLD?
TUG and XYLD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TUG and XYLD?
95.3% of TUG's money is in holdings XYLD also owns. 56.4% of XYLD's is in holdings TUG also owns. They hold 88 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in TUG and 496 in XYLD.
Which pays a higher dividend, TUG or XYLD?
TUG yields 1.88% while XYLD yields 10.44%, so XYLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XYLD better than TUG?
XYLD has a lower expense ratio. TUG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. XYLD is less concentrated, with 39.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.