UDOW vs VTI

UDOW vs VTI

Which is better, UDOW or VTI?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. UDOW led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: UDOW

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUDOWVTI
Expense Ratio0.94%0.03%Best
AUM$904M$689.2B
Dividend Yield1.11%1.06%
Holdings423,524
YTD Return+11.66%+13.02%Best
1Y Return+24.96%Best+16.63%
3Y Return (annualized)+34.41%Best+21.97%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.86%Best+11.99%
Volatility (annualized)43.8%14.8%Best
Max Drawdown-80.3%-35.0%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$18,311Best$17,616
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 9, 2010May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 11, 2010 to Oct 14, 2026 (16.7 years).

UDOW vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.7 years both funds cover.

UDOW vs VTI Performance

ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UDOW returned +24.96% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, UDOW is up 11.66% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Over three years, UDOW compounded at +34.41% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.86% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, UDOW has the edge at +25.09% annualized vs +12.80%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

UDOW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.8% compared with 14.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.3% for UDOW and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

UDOW charges 0.94% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $94 vs $3 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UDOW currently yields 1.11% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

VTI already in UDOW34.6%

At least 34.6% of VTI's money is in holdings UDOW also owns.

Stated as a floor: for UDOW, our book for it covers 84.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

30 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in UDOW and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 42 and 3,524.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in UDOWWeight in VTIDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 373.56%5.11%1.55%
AAPLApple, Inc2.30%6.30%4.00%
NVDANvidia Corp.1.61%6.88%5.27%
GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The6.21%0.38%5.83%
CATCaterpillar, Inc.5.81%0.50%5.31%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.73%3.41%1.68%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc Cap Stk Cl A2.36%2.70%0.34%
JPMJpmorgan Chase2.29%1.29%1.00%
VVisa Inc-class A Shares2.48%0.85%1.63%
AMGNAmgen Inc.2.77%0.31%2.46%

34.6% of VTI is already inside UDOW.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

UDOWVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, UDOW or VTI?

UDOW has an expense ratio of 0.94% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $91 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, UDOW or VTI?

Over the past year UDOW returned +24.96% vs +16.63% for VTI, so UDOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), UDOW annualized +25.09% vs +12.80% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, UDOW or VTI?

UDOW has been the more volatile fund at 43.8% annualized versus 14.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: UDOW -80.3% vs VTI -35.0%.

Should I hold both UDOW and VTI?

UDOW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between UDOW and VTI?

At least 34.6% of VTI's money is in holdings UDOW also owns. Our book for UDOW is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in UDOW and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, UDOW or VTI?

UDOW yields 1.11% while VTI yields 1.06%, so UDOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than UDOW?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. UDOW led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.