UNOV vs ZALT

UNOV vs ZALT

Which is better, UNOV or ZALT?

UNOV has been ahead.

ZALT has a lower expense ratio. UNOV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: ZALTHigher Returns: UNOV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUNOVZALT
Expense Ratio0.79%0.69%Best
AUM$107M$794M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1818
YTD Return+9.21%Best+6.44%
1Y Return+10.85%Best+9.12%
3Y Return (annualized)+10.39%Best+10.33%
5Y Return (annualized)+7.31%-
Volatility (annualized)5.5%3.8%Best
Max Drawdown-9.1%-8.2%Best
$10,000 over 3 years$13,687Best$13,518
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionNov 1, 2019Oct 2, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 2, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).

UNOV vs ZALT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.

Compare UNOV against instead:UNOV vs SPYUNOV vs QQQUNOV vs VOOUNOV vs VTIZALT against:ZALT vs VXUS

UNOV vs ZALT Performance

Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator US Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year UNOV returned +10.85% while ZALT returned +9.12%. Year to date, UNOV is up 9.21% versus a gain of 6.44% for ZALT.

Over three years, UNOV compounded at +10.39% per year against +10.33% for ZALT.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

UNOV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.5% compared with 3.8% for ZALT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.1% for UNOV and -8.2% for ZALT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

UNOV charges 0.79% per year while ZALT charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $69 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UNOV currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for ZALT.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of UNOV and ZALT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

UNOVZALT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, UNOV or ZALT?

UNOV has an expense ratio of 0.79% while ZALT charges 0.69%. ZALT is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, UNOV or ZALT?

Over the past year UNOV returned +10.85% vs +9.12% for ZALT, so UNOV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, UNOV or ZALT?

UNOV has been the more volatile fund at 5.5% annualized versus 3.8% for ZALT. Worst drawdown: UNOV -9.1% vs ZALT -8.2%.

Should I hold both UNOV and ZALT?

UNOV and ZALT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, UNOV or ZALT?

UNOV yields 0.00% while ZALT yields 0.00%, so ZALT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZALT better than UNOV?

ZALT has a lower expense ratio. UNOV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.