URA vs VTI
Global X Uranium ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, URA or VTI?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | URA | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5.2B | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.21% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 57 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -22.84% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | -34.63% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.77% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.15% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.3% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -93.5% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,492 | $17,616Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 4, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 5, 2010 to Oct 14, 2026 (15.9 years).
URA vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.9 years both funds cover.
URA vs VTI Performance
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year URA returned -34.63% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, URA is down 22.84% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, URA compounded at +17.77% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.15% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.44% annualized vs -3.88%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
URA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.3% compared with 14.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -93.5% for URA and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
URA charges 0.69% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, URA currently yields 5.21% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.9% of VTI's money is in holdings URA also owns.
Stated as a floor: for URA, our book for it covers 92.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
13 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in URA and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 57 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in URA | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| OKLOOklo Inc Class A | 5.59% | 0.01% | 5.58% |
| UECUranium Energy Corp | 4.63% | 0.01% | 4.62% |
| LDILoandepot Inc. | 4.46% | 0.00% | 4.46% |
| EFR:CAEnergy Fuels Inc New | 2.82% | 0.00% | 2.82% |
| SMRNuscale Power Corp Class A | 2.78% | 0.00% | 2.78% |
| LEUCentrus Energy Corp. Class A | 2.70% | 0.00% | 2.70% |
| XEX-Energy Inc Class A | 2.65% | 0.00% | 2.65% |
| VVERDERA ENERGY CORP | 0.01% | 0.85% | 0.84% |
| NNENano Nuclear Energy Inc Common Stock USD 0.0001 | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.71% |
| URGUr Energy Inc | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.41% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of URA and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, URA or VTI?
URA has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, URA or VTI?
Over the past year URA returned -34.63% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), URA annualized -3.88% vs +12.44% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, URA or VTI?
URA has been the more volatile fund at 37.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: URA -93.5% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both URA and VTI?
URA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, URA or VTI?
URA yields 5.21% while VTI yields 1.06%, so URA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than URA?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.