USMC vs WLTG
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF vs WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF
Which is better, USMC or WLTG?
Each has led over a different period.
USMC has a lower expense ratio. USMC led over 1Y and the full window, WLTG over 3Y. WLTG is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | USMC | WLTG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12%Best | 0.74% |
| AUM | $5.2B | $77M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.74% | 4.08% |
| Holdings | 58 | 87 |
| YTD Return | +13.98%Best | +7.96% |
| 1Y Return | +14.91%Best | +13.35% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.22% | +22.48%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.81% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 13.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.1%Best | -25.1% |
| $10,000 over 4.9 years | $19,200Best | $15,797 |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.3% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Principal Funds | WealthTrust Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 11, 2017 | Dec 6, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 7, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.9 years).
USMC vs WLTG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.9 years both funds cover.
USMC vs WLTG Performance
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) is an ETF from Principal Funds and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) is an ETF from WealthTrust Asset Management. Over the past year USMC returned +14.91% while WLTG returned +13.35%. Year to date, USMC is up 13.98% versus a gain of 7.96% for WLTG.
Over three years, USMC compounded at +22.22% per year against +22.48% for WLTG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
USMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 13.6% for WLTG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.1% for USMC and -25.1% for WLTG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
USMC charges 0.12% per year while WLTG charges 0.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $74 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, USMC currently yields 0.74% against 4.08% for WLTG.
Holdings Overlap
51.7% of USMC's money is in holdings WLTG also owns. 27.3% of WLTG's money is in holdings USMC also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in USMC and 41 in WLTG, against full books of 58 and 87.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 29 positions for WLTG that do not appear in our book for USMC (67.1% of the fund), and 17 for USMC that do not appear in WLTG (48.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in USMC | Weight in WLTG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.99% | 4.25% | 3.74% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 7.18% | 2.78% | 4.40% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.40% | 1.67% | 5.73% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 3.92% | 3.87% | 0.05% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc Cap Stk Cl A | 5.33% | 2.39% | 2.94% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.55% | 2.05% | 3.50% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.77% | 2.93% | 0.84% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.44% | 1.91% | 2.53% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.28% | 3.53% | 1.25% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 3.82% | 1.88% | 1.94% |
51.7% of USMC is already inside WLTG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, USMC or WLTG?
USMC has an expense ratio of 0.12% while WLTG charges 0.74%. USMC is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, USMC or WLTG?
Over the past year USMC returned +14.91% vs +13.35% for WLTG, so USMC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, USMC or WLTG?
USMC has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 13.6% for WLTG. Worst drawdown: USMC -24.1% vs WLTG -25.1%.
Should I hold both USMC and WLTG?
USMC and WLTG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between USMC and WLTG?
51.7% of USMC's money is in holdings WLTG also owns. 27.3% of WLTG's is in holdings USMC also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in USMC and 41 in WLTG.
Which pays a higher dividend, USMC or WLTG?
USMC yields 0.74% while WLTG yields 4.08%, so WLTG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WLTG better than USMC?
USMC has a lower expense ratio. USMC led over 1Y and the full window, WLTG over 3Y. WLTG is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.