VBCI vs VYM
Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, VBCI or VYM?
Long Term Mid Quality against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VBCI | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $14M | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.27% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 750 | 608 |
| YTD Return | -1.84% | +11.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.96% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Long Term Mid Quality | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
VBCI vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VBCI vs VYM Performance
Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, VBCI is down 1.84% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VBCI charges 0.08% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $4 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VBCI currently yields 2.27% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 33.3% of VYM's money is in holdings VBCI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VBCI, our book for it covers 69.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
45 positions in common, counted across the 267 positions we hold weights for in VBCI and 602 in VYM, against full books of 750 and 608.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VBCI | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.73% | 6.94% | 6.21% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.94% | 3.83% | 2.89% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.30% | 2.58% | 2.28% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 0.97% | 1.65% | 0.68% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 0.83% | 1.03% | 0.20% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.23% | 1.54% | 1.31% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 0.79% | 0.90% | 0.11% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.16% | 1.36% | 1.20% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 0.64% | 0.84% | 0.20% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 0.26% | 1.18% | 0.92% |
33.3% of VYM is already inside VBCI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VBCI or VYM?
VBCI has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between VBCI and VYM?
At least 33.3% of VYM's money is in holdings VBCI also owns. Our book for VBCI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 45 positions in common, counted across the 267 positions we hold weights for in VBCI and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, VBCI or VYM?
VBCI yields 2.27% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than VBCI?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.