VNM vs VTI
VanEck Vietnam ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, VNM or VTI?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VNM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $466M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.22% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 60 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -14.23% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | -16.76% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.58% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.25% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.1% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -62.7% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,924 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.1% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 11, 2009 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 14, 2009 to Oct 14, 2026 (17.2 years).
VNM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VNM vs VTI Performance
VanEck Vietnam ETF (VNM) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VNM returned -16.76% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, VNM is down 14.23% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, VNM compounded at +8.58% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -2.25% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.89% annualized vs -1.05%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VNM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 14.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.7% for VNM and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VNM charges 0.66% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VNM currently yields 0.22% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 56 holdings in VNM and 3,441 in VTI, totalling 95.7% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in VNM and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 60 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,156 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for VNM (97.6% of the fund), and 0 for VNM that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VNM and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VNM or VTI?
VNM has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VNM or VTI?
Over the past year VNM returned -16.76% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), VNM annualized -1.05% vs +12.89% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VNM or VTI?
VNM has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 14.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VNM -62.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both VNM and VTI?
VNM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, VNM or VTI?
VNM yields 0.22% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than VNM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.