VTI vs WOOD
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF
Which is better, VTI or WOOD?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WOOD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.39% |
| AUM | $689.2B | $257M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 3,524 | 42 |
| YTD Return | +13.02%Best | -7.85% |
| 1Y Return | +16.63%Best | -2.25% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.97%Best | -1.96% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.99%Best | -3.52% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0%Best | 22.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -49.1%Best | -63.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,616Best | $8,360 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.5%Best | 53.9% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Jun 24, 2008 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 25, 2008 to Oct 14, 2026 (18.3 years).
VTI vs WOOD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18.3 years both funds cover.
VTI vs WOOD Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year VTI returned +16.63% while WOOD returned -2.25%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.02% versus a loss of 7.85% for WOOD.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.97% per year against -1.96% for WOOD; over five years the annualized figures are +11.99% and -3.52% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +10.44% annualized vs +2.28%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WOOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.5% compared with 16.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.1% for VTI and -63.8% for WOOD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WOOD charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $39 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.06% against 2.51% for WOOD.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of VTI's money is in holdings WOOD also owns. 20.4% of WOOD's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
WOOD and VTI share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 3,441 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 25 in WOOD, against full books of 3,524 and 42.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for WOOD that do not appear in our book for VTI (0.1% of the fund), and 1,153 for VTI that do not appear in WOOD (97.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
20.4% of WOOD is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WOOD?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WOOD charges 0.39%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VTI or WOOD?
Over the past year VTI returned +16.63% vs -2.25% for WOOD, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), VTI annualized +10.44% vs +2.28% for WOOD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VTI or WOOD?
WOOD has been the more volatile fund at 22.5% annualized versus 16.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -49.1% vs WOOD -63.8%.
Should I hold both VTI and WOOD?
VTI and WOOD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WOOD?
20.4% of WOOD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 20.4% of WOOD's is in holdings VTI also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 3,441 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 25 in WOOD.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WOOD?
VTI yields 1.06% while WOOD yields 2.51%, so WOOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WOOD better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.