VTI vs XWNG
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Amplify Top 10 Space ETF
Which is better, VTI or XWNG?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | XWNG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $689.2B | $1M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 3,524 | 11 |
| YTD Return | +13.02%Best | -14.94% |
| 1Y Return | +16.63% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.97% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.99% | - |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Amplify ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Aug 19, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
VTI vs XWNG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VTI vs XWNG Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Amplify Top 10 Space ETF (XWNG) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs. Year to date, VTI is up 13.02% versus a loss of 14.94% for XWNG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while XWNG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for XWNG.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.2% of VTI's money is in holdings XWNG also owns.
Stated as a floor: for XWNG, our book for it covers 82.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
6 positions in common, counted across the 3,441 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 11 in XWNG, against full books of 3,524 and 11.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VTI and XWNG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or XWNG?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XWNG charges 0.49%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XWNG?
VTI yields 1.06% while XWNG yields 0.00%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XWNG better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.