VTI vs ZAP
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Global X US Electrification ETF
Which is better, VTI or ZAP?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, ZAP over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $689.2B | $440M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.74% |
| Holdings | 3,524 | 94 |
| YTD Return | +13.02%Best | +6.45% |
| 1Y Return | +16.63%Best | +2.72% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.97% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.99% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5%Best | 15.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -13.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $13,250 | $13,487Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.5%Best | 44.2% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
VTI vs ZAP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
VTI vs ZAP Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Global X US Electrification ETF (ZAP) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year VTI returned +16.63% while ZAP returned +2.72%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.02% versus a gain of 6.45% for ZAP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 12.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for VTI and -13.0% for ZAP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while ZAP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.06% against 1.74% for ZAP.
Holdings Overlap
1.9% of VTI's money is in holdings ZAP also owns. 93.8% of ZAP's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Most of ZAP is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
41 positions in common, counted across the 3,441 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 45 in ZAP, against full books of 3,524 and 94.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 3 positions for ZAP that do not appear in our book for VTI (5.0% of the fund), and 1,124 for VTI that do not appear in ZAP (95.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VTI | Weight in ZAP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BECfd Bloom Energy Corp- A | 0.08% | 6.08% | 6.00% |
| PWRQuanta Services Inc | 0.12% | 4.91% | 4.79% |
| ETNEaton Corp Plc | 0.21% | 4.69% | 4.48% |
| AMEAmetek Inc | 0.07% | 4.66% | 4.59% |
| DDominion Energy Inc. | 0.08% | 4.28% | 4.20% |
| EDConsolidated Edison Inc | 0.05% | 4.08% | 4.03% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 0.13% | 3.88% | 3.75% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc | 0.09% | 3.91% | 3.82% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 0.13% | 3.85% | 3.72% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 0.12% | 3.80% | 3.68% |
93.8% of ZAP is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or ZAP?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZAP charges 0.50%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VTI or ZAP?
Over the past year VTI returned +16.63% vs +2.72% for ZAP, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), VTI annualized +16.92% vs +18.08% for ZAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VTI or ZAP?
ZAP has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 12.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -19.3% vs ZAP -13.0%.
Should I hold both VTI and ZAP?
VTI and ZAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and ZAP?
93.8% of ZAP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 93.8% of ZAP's is in holdings VTI also owns. They hold 41 positions in common, counted across the 3,441 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 45 in ZAP.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or ZAP?
VTI yields 1.06% while ZAP yields 1.74%, so ZAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZAP better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, ZAP over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.