VTI vs ZINN

VTI vs ZINN

Which is better, VTI or ZINN?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.1%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns (1Y): VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVTIZINN
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.75%
AUM$689.2B$126M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings3,52470
YTD Return+13.02%Best-2.67%
1Y Return+16.63%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.97%-
5Y Return (annualized)+11.99%-
Top 10 Weight33.5%Best52.1%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Virtus Investment Partners
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMay 24, 2001Aug 31, 2015

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

VTI vs ZINN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

VTI vs ZINN Performance

Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth ETF (ZINN) is an ETF from Virtus Investment Partners. Year to date, VTI is up 13.02% versus a loss of 2.67% for ZINN.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VTI charges 0.03% per year while ZINN charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for ZINN.

Holdings Overlap

VTI already in ZINN23.9%
ZINN already in VTI78.2%

23.9% of VTI's money is in holdings ZINN also owns. 78.2% of ZINN's money is in holdings VTI also owns.

Most of ZINN is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

26 positions in common, counted across the 3,441 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 33 in ZINN, against full books of 3,524 and 70.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 3 positions for ZINN that do not appear in our book for VTI (9.3% of the fund), and 1,133 for VTI that do not appear in ZINN (73.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VTIWeight in ZINNDifference
NVDANvidia Corp6.88%8.63%1.75%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.11%2.97%2.14%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.41%4.62%1.21%
TSLATesla Inc1.40%6.17%4.77%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.04%6.38%5.34%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc2.70%3.89%1.19%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.70%2.82%1.12%
NTRANatera Inc0.06%4.43%4.37%
SNOWSnowflake Inc0.15%3.94%3.79%
CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc0.30%3.66%3.36%

78.2% of ZINN is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

VTIZINN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VTI or ZINN?

VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZINN charges 0.75%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between VTI and ZINN?

78.2% of ZINN's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 78.2% of ZINN's is in holdings VTI also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 3,441 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 33 in ZINN.

Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or ZINN?

VTI yields 1.06% while ZINN yields 0.00%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZINN better than VTI?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.