VTI vs ZMUN

VTI vs ZMUN

Which is better, VTI or ZMUN?

Large Cap Blend against Municipal Bond.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVTIZMUN
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.30%
AUM$689.2B$34M
Dividend Yield1.06%3.25%
Holdings3,524174
YTD Return+13.02%Best+2.04%
1Y Return+16.63%Best+2.84%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.97%-
5Y Return (annualized)+11.99%-
Volatility (annualized)12.6%1.1%Best
Max Drawdown-8.9%-1.0%Best
$10,000 over 1 years$11,552Best$10,270
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)F-m investments
CategoryEquityTax Preferred
StyleLarge Cap BlendMunicipal Bond
InceptionMay 24, 2001Sep 30, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).

VTI vs ZMUN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.

VTI vs ZMUN Performance

Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and F/m Ultrashort Tax Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN) is an ETF from F-m investments. Over the past year VTI returned +16.63% while ZMUN returned +2.84%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.02% versus a gain of 2.04% for ZMUN.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 1.1% for ZMUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for VTI and -1.0% for ZMUN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.08. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VTI charges 0.03% per year while ZMUN charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $30 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.06% against 3.25% for ZMUN.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 3,441 holdings in VTI and 29 in ZMUN, totalling 98.1% and 23.4% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 3,441 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 29 in ZMUN, against full books of 3,524 and 174.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of VTI and ZMUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

VTIZMUN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VTI or ZMUN?

VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZMUN charges 0.30%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, VTI or ZMUN?

Over the past year VTI returned +16.63% vs +2.84% for ZMUN, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), VTI annualized +15.52% vs +2.70% for ZMUN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, VTI or ZMUN?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 1.1% for ZMUN. Worst drawdown: VTI -8.9% vs ZMUN -1.0%.

Should I hold both VTI and ZMUN?

VTI and ZMUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.08, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or ZMUN?

VTI yields 1.06% while ZMUN yields 3.25%, so ZMUN currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZMUN better than VTI?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.