VYM vs WBIL
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF
Which is better, VYM or WBIL?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. WBIL is less concentrated, with 23.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VYM | WBIL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04%Best | 1.55% |
| AUM | $78.9B | $30M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.37% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | 608 | 142 |
| YTD Return | +11.83% | +14.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.96%Best | +14.68% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.60%Best | +10.76% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.51%Best | +6.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.7% | -25.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,241Best | $13,573 |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.8% | 23.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2006 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 27, 2014 to Oct 14, 2026 (12.1 years).
VYM vs WBIL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.1 years both funds cover.
VYM vs WBIL Performance
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year VYM returned +15.96% while WBIL returned +14.68%. Year to date, VYM is up 11.83% versus a gain of 14.67% for WBIL.
Over three years, VYM compounded at +18.60% per year against +10.76% for WBIL; over five years the annualized figures are +11.51% and +6.30% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +8.80% annualized vs +4.57%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.8% compared with 11.9% for WBIL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.7% for VYM and -25.3% for WBIL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VYM charges 0.04% per year while WBIL charges 1.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $155 annually, a gap of $151 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.37% against 0.04% for WBIL.
Holdings Overlap
14.5% of VYM's money is in holdings WBIL also owns. 41.8% of WBIL's money is in holdings VYM also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
30 positions in common, counted across the 602 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 64 in WBIL, against full books of 608 and 142.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 33 positions for WBIL that do not appear in our book for VYM (55.5% of the fund), and 543 for VYM that do not appear in WBIL (83.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VYM | Weight in WBIL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.58% | 0.83% | 1.75% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc. | 0.55% | 2.51% | 1.96% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 1.39% | 1.65% | 0.26% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.86% | 2.15% | 1.29% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 0.73% | 1.83% | 1.10% |
| QCOMQualcomm, Inc. | 0.72% | 1.83% | 1.11% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 0.40% | 2.09% | 1.69% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 0.54% | 1.88% | 1.34% |
| NTAPNetapp Inc | 0.15% | 2.25% | 2.10% |
| CMEC M E Group Inc. | 0.42% | 1.97% | 1.55% |
41.8% of WBIL is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VYM or WBIL?
VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while WBIL charges 1.55%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $151 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VYM or WBIL?
Over the past year VYM returned +15.96% vs +14.68% for WBIL, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), VYM annualized +8.80% vs +4.57% for WBIL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VYM or WBIL?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 13.8% annualized versus 11.9% for WBIL. Worst drawdown: VYM -35.7% vs WBIL -25.3%.
Should I hold both VYM and WBIL?
VYM and WBIL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VYM and WBIL?
41.8% of WBIL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 41.8% of WBIL's is in holdings VYM also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 602 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 64 in WBIL.
Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or WBIL?
VYM yields 2.37% while WBIL yields 0.04%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIL better than VYM?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. WBIL is less concentrated, with 23.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.