XTOC vs ZALT

XTOC vs ZALT

Which is better, XTOC or ZALT?

XTOC has been ahead.

ZALT has a lower expense ratio. XTOC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: ZALTHigher Returns: XTOC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricXTOCZALT
Expense Ratio0.79%0.69%Best
AUM$16M$794M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1518
YTD Return+11.90%Best+6.44%
1Y Return+15.83%Best+9.12%
3Y Return (annualized)+14.53%Best+10.33%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.73%-
Volatility (annualized)8.7%3.8%Best
Max Drawdown-18.0%-8.2%Best
$10,000 over 3 years$15,205Best$13,518
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionSep 30, 2021Oct 2, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 2, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).

XTOC vs ZALT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.

Compare XTOC against instead:XTOC vs SPYXTOC vs QQQXTOC vs VOOXTOC vs VTIZALT against:ZALT vs VXUS

XTOC vs ZALT Performance

Innovator US Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator US Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year XTOC returned +15.83% while ZALT returned +9.12%. Year to date, XTOC is up 11.90% versus a gain of 6.44% for ZALT.

Over three years, XTOC compounded at +14.53% per year against +10.33% for ZALT.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

XTOC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 8.7% compared with 3.8% for ZALT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.0% for XTOC and -8.2% for ZALT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

XTOC charges 0.79% per year while ZALT charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $69 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, XTOC currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for ZALT.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of XTOC and ZALT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

XTOCZALT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, XTOC or ZALT?

XTOC has an expense ratio of 0.79% while ZALT charges 0.69%. ZALT is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, XTOC or ZALT?

Over the past year XTOC returned +15.83% vs +9.12% for ZALT, so XTOC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, XTOC or ZALT?

XTOC has been the more volatile fund at 8.7% annualized versus 3.8% for ZALT. Worst drawdown: XTOC -18.0% vs ZALT -8.2%.

Should I hold both XTOC and ZALT?

XTOC and ZALT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, XTOC or ZALT?

XTOC yields 0.00% while ZALT yields 0.00%, so ZALT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZALT better than XTOC?

ZALT has a lower expense ratio. XTOC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.