ZALT vs ZJUL

ZALT vs ZJUL

Which is better, ZALT or ZJUL?

ZALT has been ahead.

ZALT has a lower expense ratio. ZALT led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: ZALTHigher Returns: ZALT

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricZALTZJUL
Expense Ratio0.69%Best0.79%
AUM$794M$194M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1821
YTD Return+6.44%Best+4.45%
1Y Return+9.12%Best+5.64%
3Y Return (annualized)+10.33%-
Volatility (annualized)3.5%3.3%Best
Max Drawdown-8.2%-5.5%Best
$10,000 over 2.3 years$12,254Best$11,691
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionOct 2, 2023Jul 1, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).

ZALT vs ZJUL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.

Compare ZALT against instead:ZALT vs SPYZALT vs QQQZALT vs VOOZALT vs VTIZJUL against:ZJUL vs VXUS

ZALT vs ZJUL Performance

Innovator US Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July (ZJUL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year ZALT returned +9.12% while ZJUL returned +5.64%. Year to date, ZALT is up 6.44% versus a gain of 4.45% for ZJUL.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ZALT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 3.5% compared with 3.3% for ZJUL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.2% for ZALT and -5.5% for ZJUL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ZALT charges 0.69% per year while ZJUL charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $79 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ZALT currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for ZJUL.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ZALT and ZJUL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ZALTZJUL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ZALT or ZJUL?

ZALT has an expense ratio of 0.69% while ZJUL charges 0.79%. ZALT is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ZALT or ZJUL?

Over the past year ZALT returned +9.12% vs +5.64% for ZJUL, so ZALT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ZALT annualized +9.24% vs +7.03% for ZJUL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, ZALT or ZJUL?

ZALT has been the more volatile fund at 3.5% annualized versus 3.3% for ZJUL. Worst drawdown: ZALT -8.2% vs ZJUL -5.5%.

Should I hold both ZALT and ZJUL?

ZALT and ZJUL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, ZALT or ZJUL?

ZALT yields 0.00% while ZJUL yields 0.00%, so ZJUL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZJUL better than ZALT?

ZALT has a lower expense ratio. ZALT led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.