ABFL vs AVSU
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF vs Avantis Responsible US Equity ETF
Which is better, ABFL or AVSU?
Nearly the same fund. AVSU costs less.
AVSU has a lower expense ratio. AVSU led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. AVSU is less concentrated, with 32.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABFL | AVSU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.15%Best |
| AUM | $473M | $491M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 0.89% |
| Holdings | 58 | 1,356 |
| YTD Return | +11.62% | +15.56%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.48% | +21.64%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.92% | +22.00%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.39% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0%Best | 16.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.9%Best | -21.7% |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $16,357 | $17,811Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.0% | 32.3%Best |
| Fund Family | FCF Advisors | Avantis Investors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2016 | Mar 15, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 17, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.6 years).
ABFL vs AVSU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
ABFL vs AVSU Performance
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) is an ETF from FCF Advisors and Avantis Responsible US Equity ETF (AVSU) is an ETF from Avantis Investors. Over the past year ABFL returned +12.48% while AVSU returned +21.64%. Year to date, ABFL is up 11.62% versus a gain of 15.56% for AVSU.
Over three years, ABFL compounded at +15.92% per year against +22.00% for AVSU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AVSU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 15.0% for ABFL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.9% for ABFL and -21.7% for AVSU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABFL charges 0.49% per year while AVSU charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $15 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABFL currently yields 0.60% against 0.89% for AVSU.
Holdings Overlap
79.3% of ABFL's money is in holdings AVSU also owns. 22.1% of AVSU's money is in holdings ABFL also owns.
Most of ABFL is already inside AVSU. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
39 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in ABFL and 999 in AVSU, against full books of 58 and 1,356.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 693 positions for AVSU that do not appear in our book for ABFL (73.8% of the fund), and 13 for ABFL that do not appear in AVSU (17.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABFL | Weight in AVSU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.55% | 6.08% | 0.53% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.30% | 5.66% | 0.36% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 4.03% | 0.15% | 3.88% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 3.00% | 1.03% | 1.97% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.99% | 0.93% | 2.06% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 2.90% | 0.60% | 2.30% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.98% | 0.48% | 2.50% |
| KLACKla-tencor | 2.70% | 0.72% | 1.98% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.57% | 0.59% | 1.98% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 2.78% | 0.37% | 2.41% |
79.3% of ABFL is already inside AVSU.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABFL or AVSU?
ABFL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while AVSU charges 0.15%. AVSU is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABFL or AVSU?
Over the past year ABFL returned +12.48% vs +21.64% for AVSU, so AVSU leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABFL or AVSU?
AVSU has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 15.0% for ABFL. Worst drawdown: ABFL -19.9% vs AVSU -21.7%.
Should I hold both ABFL and AVSU?
ABFL and AVSU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABFL and AVSU?
79.3% of ABFL's money is in holdings AVSU also owns. 22.1% of AVSU's is in holdings ABFL also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in ABFL and 999 in AVSU.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABFL or AVSU?
ABFL yields 0.60% while AVSU yields 0.89%, so AVSU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is AVSU better than ABFL?
AVSU has a lower expense ratio. AVSU led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. AVSU is less concentrated, with 32.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.