ABFL vs NBDS
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF vs Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
Which is better, ABFL or NBDS?
Each has led over a different period.
NBDS has a lower expense ratio. ABFL led over 1Y, NBDS over 3Y and the full window. ABFL is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABFL | NBDS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.40%Best |
| AUM | $473M | $183M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 0.33% |
| Holdings | 58 | 32 |
| YTD Return | +11.62%Best | +11.35% |
| 1Y Return | +12.48%Best | +9.23% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.92% | +21.50%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.39% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6%Best | 23.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.9%Best | -29.8% |
| $10,000 over 4.5 years | $16,033 | $16,400Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.0%Best | 46.6% |
| Fund Family | FCF Advisors | Neuberger Berman |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2016 | Apr 6, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.5 years).
ABFL vs NBDS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.5 years both funds cover.
ABFL vs NBDS Performance
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) is an ETF from FCF Advisors and Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman. Over the past year ABFL returned +12.48% while NBDS returned +9.23%. Year to date, ABFL is up 11.62% versus a gain of 11.35% for NBDS.
Over three years, ABFL compounded at +15.92% per year against +21.50% for NBDS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.4% compared with 14.6% for ABFL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.9% for ABFL and -29.8% for NBDS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABFL charges 0.49% per year while NBDS charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $40 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABFL currently yields 0.60% against 0.33% for NBDS.
Holdings Overlap
7.0% of ABFL's money is in holdings NBDS also owns. 11.6% of NBDS's money is in holdings ABFL also owns.
NBDS and ABFL share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in ABFL and 32 in NBDS, against full books of 58 and 32.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 25 positions for NBDS that do not appear in our book for ABFL (72.0% of the fund), and 49 for ABFL that do not appear in NBDS (89.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABFL and NBDS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABFL or NBDS?
ABFL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while NBDS charges 0.40%. NBDS is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABFL or NBDS?
Over the past year ABFL returned +12.48% vs +9.23% for NBDS, so ABFL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABFL or NBDS?
NBDS has been the more volatile fund at 23.4% annualized versus 14.6% for ABFL. Worst drawdown: ABFL -19.9% vs NBDS -29.8%.
Should I hold both ABFL and NBDS?
ABFL and NBDS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABFL and NBDS?
11.6% of NBDS's money is in holdings ABFL also owns. 11.6% of NBDS's is in holdings ABFL also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in ABFL and 32 in NBDS.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABFL or NBDS?
ABFL yields 0.60% while NBDS yields 0.33%, so ABFL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NBDS better than ABFL?
NBDS has a lower expense ratio. ABFL led over 1Y, NBDS over 3Y and the full window. ABFL is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.