ABFL vs TSPA
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF vs T Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF
Which is better, ABFL or TSPA?
TSPA has been ahead.
TSPA has a lower expense ratio. TSPA led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. ABFL is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABFL | TSPA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.34%Best |
| AUM | $473M | $4.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 0.55% |
| Holdings | 58 | 330 |
| YTD Return | +11.62% | +13.26%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.48% | +17.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.92% | +22.25%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.39% | +13.59%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0%Best | 15.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.0%Best | -24.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,393 | $18,910Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.0%Best | 38.1% |
| Fund Family | FCF Advisors | T.Rowe Price |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2016 | Jun 8, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 9, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.3 years).
ABFL vs TSPA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
ABFL vs TSPA Performance
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) is an ETF from FCF Advisors and T Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Over the past year ABFL returned +12.48% while TSPA returned +17.33%. Year to date, ABFL is up 11.62% versus a gain of 13.26% for TSPA.
Over three years, ABFL compounded at +15.92% per year against +22.25% for TSPA; over five years the annualized figures are +10.39% and +13.59% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TSPA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 15.0% for ABFL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.0% for ABFL and -24.7% for TSPA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABFL charges 0.49% per year while TSPA charges 0.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $34 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABFL currently yields 0.60% against 0.55% for TSPA.
Holdings Overlap
70.3% of ABFL's money is in holdings TSPA also owns. 26.1% of TSPA's money is in holdings ABFL also owns.
Most of ABFL is already inside TSPA. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
32 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in ABFL and 326 in TSPA, against full books of 58 and 330.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 283 positions for TSPA that do not appear in our book for ABFL (72.4% of the fund), and 20 for ABFL that do not appear in TSPA (26.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABFL | Weight in TSPA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.30% | 8.18% | 2.88% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.55% | 6.74% | 1.19% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.99% | 1.43% | 1.56% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 4.03% | 0.21% | 3.82% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.57% | 1.14% | 1.43% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.98% | 0.64% | 2.34% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 3.00% | 0.47% | 2.53% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 2.78% | 0.55% | 2.23% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 2.70% | 0.59% | 2.11% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 2.90% | 0.35% | 2.55% |
70.3% of ABFL is already inside TSPA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABFL or TSPA?
ABFL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while TSPA charges 0.34%. TSPA is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABFL or TSPA?
Over the past year ABFL returned +12.48% vs +17.33% for TSPA, so TSPA leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABFL or TSPA?
TSPA has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 15.0% for ABFL. Worst drawdown: ABFL -22.0% vs TSPA -24.7%.
Should I hold both ABFL and TSPA?
ABFL and TSPA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABFL and TSPA?
70.3% of ABFL's money is in holdings TSPA also owns. 26.1% of TSPA's is in holdings ABFL also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in ABFL and 326 in TSPA.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABFL or TSPA?
ABFL yields 0.60% while TSPA yields 0.55%, so ABFL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TSPA better than ABFL?
TSPA has a lower expense ratio. TSPA led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. ABFL is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.