ABLD vs CGDV
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF vs Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Which is better, ABLD or CGDV?
CGDV has been ahead.
CGDV has a lower expense ratio. CGDV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ABLD is less concentrated, with 35.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLD | CGDV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.33%Best |
| AUM | $12M | $39.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.57% | 1.23% |
| Holdings | 51 | 116 |
| YTD Return | +7.02% | +12.74%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.33% | +19.20%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.90% | +24.22%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4%Best | -21.8% |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $15,692 | $21,295Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.4%Best | 43.1% |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Capital Group (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2021 | Feb 22, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.6 years).
ABLD vs CGDV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
ABLD vs CGDV Performance
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US). Over the past year ABLD returned +11.33% while CGDV returned +19.20%. Year to date, ABLD is up 7.02% versus a gain of 12.74% for CGDV.
Over three years, ABLD compounded at +8.90% per year against +24.22% for CGDV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 14.9% for CGDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for ABLD and -21.8% for CGDV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLD charges 0.39% per year while CGDV charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $33 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLD currently yields 2.57% against 1.23% for CGDV.
Holdings Overlap
3.7% of ABLD's money is in holdings CGDV also owns. 2.0% of CGDV's money is in holdings ABLD also owns.
ABLD and CGDV share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 53 in CGDV, against full books of 51 and 116.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 47 positions for CGDV that do not appear in our book for ABLD (90.4% of the fund), and 31 for ABLD that do not appear in CGDV (67.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABLD and CGDV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLD or CGDV?
ABLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while CGDV charges 0.33%. CGDV is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLD or CGDV?
Over the past year ABLD returned +11.33% vs +19.20% for CGDV, so CGDV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLD or CGDV?
ABLD has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 14.9% for CGDV. Worst drawdown: ABLD -19.4% vs CGDV -21.8%.
Should I hold both ABLD and CGDV?
ABLD and CGDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLD and CGDV?
3.7% of ABLD's money is in holdings CGDV also owns. 2.0% of CGDV's is in holdings ABLD also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 53 in CGDV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLD or CGDV?
ABLD yields 2.57% while CGDV yields 1.23%, so ABLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CGDV better than ABLD?
CGDV has a lower expense ratio. CGDV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ABLD is less concentrated, with 35.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.