ACGR vs BASG
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF vs Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF
Which is better, ACGR or BASG?
ACGR has been ahead.
ACGR has a lower expense ratio. ACGR led over 1Y and the full window. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACGR | BASG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.61% |
| AUM | $11M | $527M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.10% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 94 | 36 |
| YTD Return | +7.66% | +10.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.05%Best | +8.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.56% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.15% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 14.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.8%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $12,176Best | $11,181 |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.4% | 48.9%Best |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | Brown Advisory |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2021 | Jun 13, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
ACGR vs BASG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
ACGR vs BASG Performance
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) is an ETF from American Century Investments and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) is an ETF from Brown Advisory. Over the past year ACGR returned +9.05% while BASG returned +8.00%. Year to date, ACGR is up 7.66% versus a gain of 10.02% for BASG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 14.4% for BASG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.8% for ACGR and -19.3% for BASG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACGR charges 0.39% per year while BASG charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $61 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACGR currently yields 0.10% against 0.00% for BASG.
Holdings Overlap
33.9% of ACGR's money is in holdings BASG also owns. 50.7% of BASG's money is in holdings ACGR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
14 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in ACGR and 34 in BASG, against full books of 94 and 36.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 17 positions for BASG that do not appear in our book for ACGR (41.8% of the fund), and 74 for ACGR that do not appear in BASG (63.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACGR | Weight in BASG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 13.38% | 8.77% | 4.61% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.90% | 5.99% | 1.09% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.72% | 4.32% | 1.40% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.00% | 5.83% | 3.83% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 1.85% | 4.74% | 2.89% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 0.64% | 4.93% | 4.29% |
| CDNSCadence Design Systems Inc. | 1.11% | 2.83% | 1.72% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 1.06% | 2.11% | 1.05% |
| SNOWSnowflake Inc | 0.48% | 2.56% | 2.08% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 1.33% | 1.63% | 0.30% |
50.7% of BASG is already inside ACGR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACGR or BASG?
ACGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while BASG charges 0.61%. ACGR is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACGR or BASG?
Over the past year ACGR returned +9.05% vs +8.00% for BASG, so ACGR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ACGR annualized +16.35% vs +8.97% for BASG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACGR or BASG?
ACGR has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 14.4% for BASG. Worst drawdown: ACGR -15.8% vs BASG -19.3%.
Should I hold both ACGR and BASG?
ACGR and BASG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACGR and BASG?
50.7% of BASG's money is in holdings ACGR also owns. 50.7% of BASG's is in holdings ACGR also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in ACGR and 34 in BASG.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACGR or BASG?
ACGR yields 0.10% while BASG yields 0.00%, so ACGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BASG better than ACGR?
ACGR has a lower expense ratio. ACGR led over 1Y and the full window. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.